ticket: record file mutation review
This commit is contained in:
parent
60e12a94d1
commit
05bb33ed8e
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
title: 'Edit/Writeの同一ファイル変更をToolExecutionContextで直列化する'
|
||||
state: 'inprogress'
|
||||
created_at: '2026-06-10T07:49:10Z'
|
||||
updated_at: '2026-06-10T09:29:06Z'
|
||||
updated_at: '2026-06-10T09:37:59Z'
|
||||
assignee: null
|
||||
queued_by: 'workspace-panel'
|
||||
queued_at: '2026-06-10T08:10:58Z'
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -97,3 +97,32 @@ Notes:
|
|||
- `nix build .#yoi` not yet run on this branch; Orchestrator should run it before/after merge because this changes tool runtime code and crate feature configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- event: review author: reviewer-serialize-file-mutations at: 2026-06-10T09:37:59Z status: approve -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Review: approve
|
||||
|
||||
Branch-local review verdict: approve
|
||||
|
||||
Blockers: none.
|
||||
|
||||
Evidence:
|
||||
- Diff is limited to `crates/tools`; Worker-wide scheduler semantics were not changed.
|
||||
- Serialization is closed over built-in `Write`/`Edit` mutation boundary.
|
||||
- `Write` and `Edit` share the same `Tracker` per-target-file guard.
|
||||
- Guard covers `Write` existing check/read/verify/write/record and `Edit` read/verify/transform/write/record critical sections.
|
||||
- Path keying canonicalizes target path/canonical parent/lexical fallback, while different files use different mutexes.
|
||||
- Tests cover same-file write→edit ordering, failed mutation release, equivalent path guard, and different-file non-blocking.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation run by reviewer:
|
||||
- `cargo test -p tools --lib` passed (99 passed).
|
||||
- `cargo check -p tools` passed.
|
||||
- `git diff --check $(git merge-base HEAD develop)..HEAD` passed.
|
||||
- `nix build .#yoi` passed.
|
||||
|
||||
Non-blocking note:
|
||||
- `ToolExecutionContext` is currently used for diagnostics/correlation, not a full call-index scheduler. Current Worker approved-call order and early guard acquisition satisfy the requirement, but future changes that add awaits before guard acquisition should re-check ordering guarantees.
|
||||
|
||||
This is branch-local review evidence; final main-branch approval/close belongs to merge-completion.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user