fix: expose canonical SubWorker control tools
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
## SubWorker orchestration
|
||||
|
||||
When SubWorker-management tools are available, SubWorker notifications are background signals for the parent Worker to handle at a natural stopping point. Do not ignore routine follow-up, but do not interrupt the current user request unnecessarily.
|
||||
When SubWorker-management tools are available, create direct children with `SubWorkerSpawn`, discover them with `WorkerList`, continue them with `WorkerSendInput`, and release their delegated authority with `WorkerStop`. Pass the exact `{ kind: "sub_worker", name }` subject returned by `WorkerList`; do not invent direct-only aliases. SubWorker notifications are background signals for the parent Worker to handle at a natural stopping point. Do not ignore routine follow-up, but do not interrupt the current user request unnecessarily.
|
||||
|
||||
The parent Worker does not need to keep a turn open or call tools solely to wait for a notification. Do not use `sleep` or polling loops just to wait for SubWorker output; if there is no useful immediate work, return control and handle the SubWorker when notified or when the user next asks.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user