ticket: split orchestrator automation phases

This commit is contained in:
2026-06-07 12:57:40 +09:00
parent 9aa6e7d1ab
commit 550e0159ed
14 changed files with 337 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
---
id: 20260607-035201-orchestrator-worktree-agent-routing
slug: orchestrator-worktree-agent-routing
title: Orchestrator worktree agent routing
status: open
kind: task
priority: P1
labels: [orchestrator, worktree, pod, review, workflow]
workflow_state: intake
created_at: 2026-06-07T03:52:01Z
updated_at: 2026-06-07T03:52:01Z
assignee: null
legacy_ticket: null
---
## Background
After a queued Ticket is accepted as `inprogress`, the Orchestrator should be able to route implementation work through the existing `worktree-workflow` and `multi-agent-workflow` operational model. The current workflows already describe the desired behavior: create a child worktree, spawn a coder Pod with scoped write access, spawn an independent reviewer sibling, and run review/fix loops.
This ticket is the worktree/coder/reviewer execution slice under `workspace-panel-orchestrator-queue-automation`.
## Goal
Make the workspace Orchestrator execute accepted in-progress Tickets through worktree + coder/reviewer Pod routing using the existing workflow contracts as builtin/role guidance.
## Requirements
- Use `worktree-workflow` as the mechanical worktree creation/management contract.
- Use `multi-agent-workflow` as the coder/reviewer sibling orchestration contract.
- Orchestrator must only start this path after the Ticket is accepted as `inprogress`.
- Create one implementation worktree per Ticket/bounded task under `.worktree/<task-name>`.
- Exclude `.yoi` from child worktrees and keep Ticket/thread/workflow updates in the main workspace.
- Spawn coder Pods with read access to the main workspace and write access only to the child worktree or narrower implementation scope.
- Spawn reviewer Pods as Orchestrator siblings, not coder children, with read-only scope by default.
- Coder task prompts must include an intent packet: intent, requirements, invariants, non-goals, escalation conditions, validation expectations, worktree path, and branch.
- Reviewer task prompts must focus on Ticket intent, diff, invariants, validation adequacy, and blocker/non-blocker classification.
- Orchestrator must record progress in the Ticket thread at meaningful checkpoints:
- accepted worktree/branch plan;
- coder delegated;
- coder completed or blocked;
- reviewer delegated;
- review approved/requested changes;
- fix loop outcome.
- Orchestrator must not merge in this ticket's scope. It should produce a merge-ready dossier for `orchestrator-merge-completion`.
- If compaction occurs, workflow obligations should remain understandable; relate to `preserve-active-workflows-across-compaction` but do not block first implementation on it.
## Non-goals
- Queue notification / queued acceptance; that belongs to `orchestrator-queued-ticket-routing`.
- Merge/cleanup/close; that belongs to `orchestrator-merge-completion`.
- Broad conflict/dependency inference beyond the first-pass routing decision.
- Dynamic workflow-state tool gating.
- Letting coder Pods edit main workspace Ticket records or `.yoi`.
## Acceptance criteria
- Orchestrator has builtin/role guidance or implementation wiring that follows `worktree-workflow` and `multi-agent-workflow` for accepted Tickets.
- Worktree creation excludes `.yoi`.
- Coder and reviewer Pods are spawned as siblings under Orchestrator with the expected scopes.
- Progress is recorded in the Ticket thread.
- A merge-ready dossier format is produced after review approval and validation.
- Tests or prompt/resource tests cover the worktree/coder/reviewer routing instructions and scope boundaries.
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
<!-- event: create author: LocalTicketBackend at: 2026-06-07T03:52:01Z -->
## Created
Created by LocalTicketBackend create.
---