fix: complete state-contract naming cleanup
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
||||
# Review verdict validation and single-call policy
|
||||
|
||||
During T-696's independent review, `ReviewRequested` captured MR `01a10bc8-59f4-7630-8166-d8cd71943e15`, source `9812e68b4d4021ea778a40d9ead4fe545d09e8bf`, and Ticket revision `00001M4517HE0:5`. The Reviewer reproduced a pending-upload deletion defect and attempted a structured `request_changes` verdict. The request used finding severity `medium`; the Backend returned HTTP 422, listing the accepted values as `blocker`, `major`, `minor`, and `note`. No review ID or verdict event was returned.
|
||||
Editorial note (2026-10-10): obsolete state terminology is summarized by purpose below; cited IDs, commits and validation results still describe the original investigation, not new executions.
|
||||
|
||||
During T-696's independent review, `ReviewRequested` captured MR `01a10bc8-59f4-7630-8166-d8cd71943e15`, source `9812e68b4d4021ea778a40d9ead4fe545d09e8bf`, and the then-current Ticket item reference `00001M4517HE0:5`. The Reviewer reproduced a pending-upload deletion defect and attempted a structured `request_changes` verdict. The request used finding severity `medium`; the Backend returned HTTP 422, listing the accepted values as `blocker`, `major`, `minor`, and `note`. No review ID or verdict event was returned.
|
||||
|
||||
The Reviewer obeyed the role prompt's instruction to call `ReviewMergeRequest` exactly once and did not retry. Its prose recommendation and artifacts are evidence of investigation, not recorded review authority. The parent preserves the finding, fixes the defect, and requests a new independent review bound to the updated source; it does not invent a verdict or bypass the rejected operation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user