fix: complete state-contract naming cleanup

web/workspace/test/config-source/api.test.ts

@@ -197,12 +197,12 @@ Deno.test("config source API rejects mismatched entry map paths", async () => {
   );
 });
 
-Deno.test("config source API rejects removed snapshot revision fields and oversized entry content", () => {
+Deno.test("config source API rejects unknown snapshot fields and oversized entry content", () => {
   assertThrows(
     () =>
       parseWorkspaceConfigTreeResponse({
         ...tree,
-        snapshot: { ...snapshot, revision: 7 },
+        snapshot: { ...snapshot, unexpected_field: true },
       }),
     ConfigSourceApiError,
     "invalid response",

web/workspace/test/config-source/wasm-parity.test.ts

@@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ Deno.test("generated WASM diagnostics carry snapshot provenance", () => {
   }>;
   assertEquals(diagnostics[0].path, "workspace.dcdl");
   assertEquals(diagnostics[0].tree_digest, fixtureSnapshot(snapshot).digest);
-  assertEquals("revision" in diagnostics[0], false);
   assertEquals(diagnostics[0].kind, "syntax");
 });
 
@@ -938,7 +937,6 @@ Deno.test("generated WASM returns to the same content digest and enforces entry
     content: "{ broken = ; }",
   }]) as ConfigTreeSnapshot;
   assertEquals(changed.digest === base.digest, false);
-  assertEquals("revision" in changed, false);
   const diagnostics = analyze_snapshot(changed, "main.dcdl", undefined) as Array<{ tree_digest: string }>;
   assertEquals(diagnostics.length > 0, true);
   assertEquals(diagnostics.every((diagnostic) => diagnostic.tree_digest === changed.digest), true);

web/workspace/test/repository-access/model.test.ts

@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Deno.test("Repository Access distinguishes permission, conflict, field, and miss
     repositoryAccessRequestError(409, "rotate the key").message.includes(
       "Reload",
     ),
-    "409 should explain revision recovery",
+    "409 should explain conflict recovery",
   );
   assert(
     repositoryAccessRequestError(422, "rotate the key").message.includes(

web/workspace/test/visual-review/README.md

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ capture error is expected. To repeat dark captures, use a scenario copy with
 
 ## Implementer-owned visual review
 
-- Baseline revision: `e939cd4e4b1f6b63b81411fd7766062f2d69ad0d`.
+- Baseline commit: `e939cd4e4b1f6b63b81411fd7766062f2d69ad0d`.
 - Before: `.svelte-kit/t717/visual/before-final-light` and `before-dark`.
   These use an isolated build under `.svelte-kit/t717/baseline-source`, with the
   changed production form, catalog API, model, and CSS restored from baseline