ticket: split ticket lifecycle feature

This commit is contained in:
Keisuke Hirata 2026-06-07 12:35:57 +09:00
parent 24d6a62a54
commit c57d13e61b
No known key found for this signature in database
5 changed files with 96 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ priority: P1
labels: [panel, orchestrator, ticket, automation, workflow] labels: [panel, orchestrator, ticket, automation, workflow]
workflow_state: intake workflow_state: intake
created_at: 2026-06-07T02:02:15Z created_at: 2026-06-07T02:02:15Z
updated_at: 2026-06-07T02:35:20Z updated_at: 2026-06-07T03:35:44Z
assignee: null assignee: null
legacy_ticket: null legacy_ticket: null
--- ---

View File

@ -27,3 +27,21 @@ Ordering invariant:
Short-term implementation may enforce this through Orchestrator workflow/prompt text plus the existing typed workflow-state tool. Longer-term, prefer a typed Orchestrator operation such as `AcceptQueuedTicket` / `StartTicketWork` that validates `queued`, records the acceptance transition, establishes any local claim/lease, and only then allows worktree/Pod launch. Short-term implementation may enforce this through Orchestrator workflow/prompt text plus the existing typed workflow-state tool. Longer-term, prefer a typed Orchestrator operation such as `AcceptQueuedTicket` / `StartTicketWork` that validates `queued`, records the acceptance transition, establishes any local claim/lease, and only then allows worktree/Pod launch.
--- ---
<!-- event: decision author: hare at: 2026-06-07T03:35:44Z -->
## Decision
## Split: Ticket lifecycle domain feature
Created `ticket-lifecycle-pod-feature` to pull the domain tool/feature part out of Orchestrator automation.
Decision:
- Ticket lifecycle should be implemented as a Ticket-domain `pod::feature`, not an Orchestrator feature.
- Features represent domain capabilities; roles/profiles decide which subset/authority they receive.
- Orchestrator automation should consume the Ticket lifecycle feature for queued Ticket inspection and lifecycle transitions.
- Companion/Intake/coder/reviewer may receive different Ticket feature subsets according to their policies.
This keeps `workspace-panel-orchestrator-queue-automation` focused on routing behavior, queued notification handling, acceptance sequencing, and worktree/Pod orchestration rather than basic Ticket tool registration.
---

View File

@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
---
id: 20260607-033536-ticket-lifecycle-pod-feature
slug: ticket-lifecycle-pod-feature
title: Ticket lifecycle pod feature
status: open
kind: task
priority: P1
labels: [ticket, pod-feature, tools, orchestration, workflow]
workflow_state: intake
created_at: 2026-06-07T03:35:36Z
updated_at: 2026-06-07T03:35:36Z
assignee: null
legacy_ticket: null
---
## Background
Panel/Orchestrator queue automation needs Ticket lifecycle operations to be available to Pods through the feature/tool system. This should not be modeled as an "Orchestrator feature": features should represent domain capabilities, not roles. Orchestrator, Intake, Companion, coder, and reviewer profiles may each be granted different subsets of the Ticket domain capability by policy/profile configuration.
The immediate motivation is queued Ticket handling: when a Ticket enters `workflow_state = queued`, the Orchestrator should be able to inspect Ticket state, record decisions/progress/blockers, and transition lifecycle state according to the Ticket workflow contract before starting worktree/Pod side effects. Prompt instructions are acceptable for sequencing initially; the first step is to make the Ticket lifecycle capability a proper `pod::feature` domain feature.
## Goal
Implement a `pod::feature`-based Ticket lifecycle domain feature that registers typed Ticket lifecycle tools for Pods, without making the feature role-specific.
## Domain model
- Feature identity should be Ticket-domain oriented, e.g. `ticket_lifecycle` / `ticket` rather than `orchestrator`.
- Role/profile policy decides which tools or permission level a Pod receives.
- Orchestrator may receive mutating lifecycle tools.
- Companion should receive read/status-only Ticket tools by default.
- Intake may receive create/update/intake-ready tools needed to materialize Tickets.
- Coder/reviewer may receive report/review/comment tools as appropriate.
## Requirements
- Add or extend a `pod::feature` module for Ticket lifecycle/tool registration.
- Register typed Ticket tools through the feature system rather than ad-hoc role-specific wiring.
- Cover at least the lifecycle operations needed by Panel/Orchestrator automation:
- Ticket list/show read access;
- append comment/decision/implementation report events;
- append review events where granted;
- `intake -> ready` intake-ready operation where granted;
- `queued -> inprogress` and `inprogress -> done` workflow-state transitions where granted;
- close Ticket where granted.
- Keep transition enforcement in the Ticket backend/tool implementation, not only in prompts.
- Do not make this an Orchestrator-only feature. The same domain feature must be grantable with different permissions to different role profiles.
- Provide a clear policy/config surface for read-only vs mutating Ticket lifecycle access, or use the existing feature/tool permission machinery if it already supports this distinction.
- Ensure tool descriptions/prompts communicate the sequencing contract:
- queued Ticket implementation side effects should occur only after `queued -> inprogress` acceptance;
- prompt sequencing is acceptable initially, but tool behavior must still enforce valid workflow transitions.
- Preserve current typed Ticket backend invariants and doctor validation.
- Keep local Pod/session assignment out of git-tracked Ticket metadata; use the existing local role session registry for local runtime association when needed.
## Non-goals
- Implementing full Orchestrator queue automation in this ticket.
- Implementing workflow state-machine-based dynamic tool gating.
- Replacing prompt/workflow sequencing with a complete operation-state enforcement runtime.
- Making `StartTicketWork` / `AcceptQueuedTicket` a composite tool unless it naturally falls out as a small wrapper; composite orchestration can remain a follow-up.
- Adding Companion Bash or broad workspace mutation authority.
## Acceptance criteria
- Ticket lifecycle tools are contributed through a Ticket-domain `pod::feature`.
- The feature can be granted to different roles/profiles with different authority levels; it is not hard-coded as an Orchestrator feature.
- Orchestrator-capable profiles can receive the Ticket lifecycle tools needed to inspect queued Tickets and perform `queued -> inprogress` / `inprogress -> done` transitions.
- Read-only/status roles can receive Ticket read tools without mutating lifecycle authority.
- Existing Ticket transition constraints remain enforced by typed backend/tool paths.
- Tests cover feature registration and at least one read-only vs mutating permission/grant distinction, or document why the existing feature permission tests already cover it.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
<!-- event: create author: LocalTicketBackend at: 2026-06-07T03:35:36Z -->
## Created
Created by LocalTicketBackend create.
---