ticket: move local storage to .yoi/tickets

This commit is contained in:
2026-06-06 06:44:10 +09:00
parent 749b3f3aee
commit da94b1ec50
529 changed files with 98 additions and 156 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
# Workspace orchestration panel UI design draft
## Position
The workspace panel should be a successor to the current `--multi` surface, not a two-pane composition of `--multi` plus the normal single-Pod UI. The default unit should be Ticket/action state; Pods are execution/detail resources that the user can attach to on demand.
## UI shape
```text
Workspace Orchestration Panel
├─ header: workspace, orchestrator state, companion state
├─ primary list: user-action-required Tickets / Intakes / Reviews
├─ detail pane: selected Ticket plan, current phase, related Pods, latest reports
├─ optional timeline/plan view: umbrella/child dependency lanes and phase progress
└─ composer: explicit target selector
```
The main list must not be a raw Pod list. It should sort by user decision priority:
1. Intake needs clarification or approval.
2. Ticket is ready for human Go.
3. Review or close decision is required.
4. Ticket is blocked by an explicit human/project decision.
5. Active implementation/review work.
6. Informational Pod status and restorable historical sessions.
## Relationship to `--multi` and normal TUI
Reuse the useful `--multi` behaviors:
- discover visible live/restorable Pods;
- show live/stopped/working state;
- choose a send/attach target;
- attach to a Pod/session and return to the workspace panel;
- keep background Pods alive when the panel exits.
Do not embed the normal single-Pod UI as a permanent second pane. The panel should drill into a selected Pod/session only when the user explicitly attaches. This avoids maintaining two simultaneous chat surfaces and keeps normal Pod history ownership unchanged.
## Composer target model
The composer has an explicit target selector:
- `Companion`: management chat for this workspace panel session.
- `New Intake`: send the composer body as the initial user input of a new Ticket Intake Pod.
- `Selected Ticket`: record a comment/decision/Go/review-style action against the selected Ticket, usually via Ticket tools or an Orchestrator notification.
- `Selected Pod`: advanced/direct send or attach path, not the main workflow.
Dynamic user text must be committed to the destination authority:
- Companion text goes to Companion history.
- New Intake text goes to the Intake Pod initial user input/history.
- Ticket decisions/comments go to Ticket records and/or the Pod that receives the actual message.
- Nothing should be injected only into hidden context.
## Ticket-centric detail model
Each visible Ticket row should be backed by a plain data entry, not by direct render-time Pod inspection:
```text
TicketPanelEntry
- id / slug / title / status
- current phase: intake | preflight | implementing | reviewing | close_ready | blocked | closed
- next user action: clarify | go | review | close | wait | none
- parent/child relationship
- related role Pods and their live/restorable state
- latest plan / implementation report / review summary excerpts
- diagnostics and blocked reason
```
This model should be assembled from the Ticket backend, Ticket thread entries, known role launches, visible Pod metadata, and Orchestrator/Intake handoff records. The UI should consume this plain model so later views can be added without coupling rendering to Pod internals.
## Timeline / Gantt-like view
A useful first version is a phase/dependency timeline rather than a date-based scheduler:
```text
yoi-local-ticket-backend-migration
├─ ✓ yoi-ticket-cli-parity
├─ ▶ builtin-yoi-local-ticket-backend-config
├─ ○ migrate-ticket-storage-to-yoi-tickets
└─ ○ remove-tickets-sh
workspace-orchestration-panel
├─ ○ workspace-orchestration-panel-design
├─ ○ workspace-panel-orchestrator-lifecycle
├─ ○ workspace-panel-composer-targets
├─ ○ ticket-intake-orchestrator-handoff
└─ ○ workspace-panel-action-model
```
Per-ticket phase lanes can show progress without pretending the system has reliable time estimates:
```text
Ticket Intake Preflight Implement Review Close
backend cfg ✓ ✓ ▶ ○ ○
storage move ✓ ○ ○ ○ ○
panel design ▶ ○ ○ ○ ○
```
This captures what currently matters most: dependency order, gate state, responsible Pods, and human decision points. Duration/ETA scheduling can be added later if the backend starts recording enough authoritative timing data.
## Orchestrator lifecycle
When the workspace panel opens, restore or spawn a workspace Orchestrator named from the workspace directory, e.g. `<dir-name>-orchestrator`. The panel should display its state but should not own its lifetime; closing the panel leaves the Orchestrator running.
Intake Pods receive the Orchestrator handoff/notification target at launch so they can report clarified Ticket readiness without automatically starting implementation. The Orchestrator may prepare routing/preflight, but human Go remains an explicit action.
## Initial implementation boundary
Implement in this order:
1. Build the plain `WorkspacePanelModel` / `TicketPanelEntry` / `UserActionEntry` model.
2. Make the existing multi-Pod panel consume enough of that model to show action-prioritized Ticket rows.
3. Add composer target selection for Companion vs New Intake.
4. Add attach/drill-down and return behavior for related Pods.
5. Add the phase/dependency timeline view.
The existing `:ticket ...` commands remain as low-level fallback and debugging affordances, not the primary UX.
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
---
id: 20260605-210704-workspace-orchestration-panel-design
slug: workspace-orchestration-panel-design
title: Workspace orchestration panel design
status: open
kind: task
priority: P1
labels: [tui, design, orchestration, panel]
created_at: 2026-06-05T21:07:04Z
updated_at: 2026-06-05T21:22:49Z
assignee: null
legacy_ticket: null
---
## Background
The next TUI should not be another small `:` command extension. The desired feature is a workspace-scoped orchestration panel with explicit Companion/Intake composer targets, background Orchestrator lifecycle, Intake handoff, and a user-action-oriented model.
## Requirements
Produce a design artifact that fixes:
- panel entrypoint and relation to current `--multi`;
- Companion lifecycle and identity;
- workspace Orchestrator lifecycle and naming rule (`<dir-name>-orchestrator`);
- composer target model:
- Companion;
- Ticket Intake;
- how Intake launch avoids writing the user request into the Companion/current Pod history;
- how Intake receives Orchestrator notification/handoff target;
- action model priorities:
- user response required;
- Intake draft ready;
- Ticket ready for Go;
- blocked/action-required;
- review/close/preflight decisions;
- active background work;
- informational Pod status;
- Go semantics for a fixed Ticket;
- relationship to existing `:ticket ...` command fallback;
- failure/diagnostic behavior;
- implementation sequence.
## Non-goals
- Code implementation.
- Generic scheduler/lease/queue.
- Automatic implementation without Go/authorization.
- Replacing Ticket workflows.
## Acceptance criteria
- A design artifact exists under this Ticket's `artifacts/` directory.
- The artifact defines the state/action model and responsibility boundaries clearly enough to implement child tickets.
- The artifact explicitly preserves history/context rules: dynamic messages are committed to the destination Pod history, not injected into hidden context.
- Reviewer or parent approves the design before implementation child tickets proceed.
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
<!-- event: create author: yoi ticket at: 2026-06-05T21:07:04Z -->
## Created
Created by LocalTicketBackend create.
---
<!-- event: plan author: hare at: 2026-06-05T21:22:49Z -->
## Plan
Recorded an initial UI design draft from the panel discussion in `artifacts/workspace-panel-ui-design.md`.
Key direction:
- make the workspace panel a successor to `--multi`, not a permanent split with the normal single-Pod UI;
- use Ticket/action state as the default unit and attach to Pod/session details only on demand;
- provide an explicit composer target selector for Companion / New Intake / Selected Ticket / advanced Selected Pod;
- add a Gantt-like phase/dependency timeline based on Ticket gates and umbrella/child ordering rather than date estimates.
This is a design draft for review/iteration, not implementation approval for the child panel tickets yet.
---