merge: feature provider api

This commit is contained in:
2026-06-14 15:38:40 +09:00
3 changed files with 650 additions and 52 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: 'Extend pod::feature API for external protocol-backed capability providers'
state: 'inprogress'
created_at: '2026-06-10T07:48:14Z'
updated_at: '2026-06-14T06:10:45Z'
updated_at: '2026-06-14T06:36:23Z'
assignee: null
readiness: 'implementation_ready'
risk_flags: ['feature-api', 'tool-registry', 'permission-scope', 'prompt-context', 'dynamic-registry', 'service-lifecycle']
+58
View File
@@ -81,4 +81,62 @@ Validation:
Ticket evidence, satisfied dependency on HostAuthority cleanup, relation records, orchestration plan, and clean workspace state were checked. No blockers remain; accept for implementation before worktree/spawn side effects.
---
<!-- event: implementation_report author: hare at: 2026-06-14T06:30:42Z -->
## Implementation report
Implemented provider feature API for Ticket 00001KTR81P9X.
Summary:
- Extended `pod::feature` descriptors with `ProtocolProviderDeclaration` and provider lifecycle state/diagnostic reporting.
- Added `ProtocolProviderContribution` and `FeatureInstallContext::protocol_providers()` so startup-discovered provider tools, services, and background task declarations register through the existing feature install pipeline.
- Provider tools are materialized once at startup and then installed as ordinary Worker tool definitions, preserving stable schemas for the run and normal permission/history/bounded-result execution paths.
- Unavailable providers record lifecycle diagnostics and skip discovered contributions without adding a separate feature authority layer.
- Added focused tests for ready providers, failed providers, undeclared providers, and stable dynamic tool metadata.
Validation:
- PASS: `cargo fmt --check`
- PASS: `cargo test -p pod feature::tests`
- PASS: `cargo check --workspace --all-targets`
- PASS: `git diff --check`
- FAIL (pre-existing/unrelated prompt assertion): `cargo test -p pod` fails in `prompt::catalog::tests::pod_orchestration_guidance_section_renders_resource_body` and `prompt::system::tests::pod_orchestration_guidance_is_included_for_pod_management_tools`, both expecting the phrase `worktree status, diff, and test results`.
- FAIL (environment/resource): `nix build --no-link .#yoi` compiles through the Rust crates but fails during final binary link with `No space left on device`.
Risks/notes:
- This does not implement MCP protocol, MCP trust policy, plugin permissions, subprocess management, or a replacement HostAuthority-style grant layer.
- Provider metadata and diagnostics remain install-report data; actual provider tool execution goes through the normal Worker/tool machinery.
---
<!-- event: review author: hare at: 2026-06-14T06:36:23Z status: approve -->
## Review: approve
## Review: approve
Reviewed implementation commit `053a4f90` against Ticket `00001KTR81P9X` and base routing commit `f709fc10`.
Evidence:
- Diff is limited to the Ticket record and `crates/pod/src/feature.rs`.
- The provider API extension stays in `pod::feature` as a contribution/reporting substrate: `ProviderId`, `ProtocolProviderDeclaration`, `ProtocolProviderLifecycleState`, `ProtocolProviderContribution`, lifecycle diagnostics, and `FeatureInstallContext::protocol_providers()` were added without introducing `HostAuthority`, grant replacement types, MCP trust policy, plugin permission policy, subprocess management, or ToolRegistry/history bypasses.
- Startup-discovered provider tools are materialized once during feature installation and then registered through `Worker::register_tools`, preserving stable schemas for the run and normal Worker permission/history/result machinery.
- Ready providers can contribute tools, service declarations, and background task declarations through the existing feature install report/registry surfaces; unavailable providers record lifecycle diagnostics and skip discovered contributions instead of panicking or installing stale tools.
- Diagnostics cover undeclared provider ids, duplicate tool names through the shared tool registrar, and failed lifecycle states.
- API shape is type-oriented and localized; I did not find broad compatibility glue or authority-layer leakage.
Validation performed:
- PASS `cargo fmt --check`
- PASS `git diff --check f709fc10..HEAD`
- PASS `cargo test -p pod feature::tests` (17 passed)
- PASS `cargo check --workspace --all-targets`
- FAIL `cargo test -p pod`: 323 passed / 2 failed in the same prompt assertion tests reported by Coder (`prompt::catalog::tests::pod_orchestration_guidance_section_renders_resource_body`, `prompt::system::tests::pod_orchestration_guidance_is_included_for_pod_management_tools`, both expecting `worktree status, diff, and test results`). The reviewed diff does not touch prompt resources or those prompt modules, so I classify this as unrelated/pre-existing for this Ticket.
Risks / notes:
- I did not rerun `nix build`; Coder reported a final-link `No space left on device` after Rust compilation. Focused Rust validation passed.
- Permission denial and bounded-result behavior are not reimplemented in this diff; they are intentionally inherited because provider tools are installed as ordinary Worker tools.
---