Hare/yoi
1
1
Fork 0
Code Actions Packages Releases Activity

ticket: review queued routing implementation

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Keisuke Hirata 2026-06-07 14:08:44 +09:00
parent df6d7ee9c3
commit fd9613222e
No known key found for this signature in database
2 changed files with 22 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
.yoi/tickets/open/20260607-035143-orchestrator-queued-ticket-routing/item.md
View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ priority: P1
labels: [panel, orchestrator, ticket, routing, workflow]
workflow_state: ready
created_at: 2026-06-07T03:51:43Z
updated_at: 2026-06-07T05:07:50Z
updated_at: 2026-06-07T05:08:38Z
assignee: null
legacy_ticket: null
---

21
.yoi/tickets/open/20260607-035143-orchestrator-queued-ticket-routing/thread.md
View File

@ -115,3 +115,24 @@ Parent-side workflow update:
- The workflow now treats Panel Queue / queued notification as routing authorization, requires `queued -> inprogress` before implementation side effects, and documents blocked queued handling.
---
<!-- event: implementation_report author: hare at: 2026-06-07T05:08:38Z -->
## Implementation report
## Review delegation
External review delegated to `orchestrator-routing-reviewer-20260607`.
Review scope:
- Child implementation commit `ccf43f8 tui: update queued ticket routing notification` in `.worktree/orchestrator-queued-ticket-routing`.
- Parent-side workflow update in `.yoi/workflow/ticket-orchestrator-routing.md` committed on `develop` in `df6d7ee`.
Review focus:
- Queue notice/notification should actively authorize Orchestrator routing without implying passive no-op behavior.
- Notification must not instruct blind implementation Pod spawning.
- Workflow must require `queued -> inprogress` acceptance before worktree/SpawnPod side effects.
- Worktree/coder/reviewer routing, merge completion, and plan-tool behavior must remain out of scope.
- Focused tests should cover the changed wording/contract.
---