# Workspace orchestration panel UI design draft ## Position The workspace panel should be a successor to the current `--multi` surface, not a two-pane composition of `--multi` plus the normal single-Pod UI. The default unit should be Ticket/action state; Pods are execution/detail resources that the user can attach to on demand. The panel is not only a Ticket status dashboard. It is a workspace cockpit for reading Ticket state, handling human decision points, launching Intake/Orchestrator actions, and drilling into related Pods when needed. ## UI shape ```text Workspace Orchestration Panel ├─ header: workspace, orchestrator state, companion state ├─ primary list: user-action-required Tickets / Intakes / Reviews ├─ detail pane: selected Ticket plan, current phase, related Pods, latest reports ├─ optional timeline/plan view: umbrella/child dependency lanes and phase progress └─ composer: explicit target selector ``` The main list must not be a raw Pod list. It should sort by user decision priority: 1. Intake needs clarification or approval. 2. Ticket is ready for human Go. 3. Review or close decision is required. 4. Ticket is blocked by an explicit human/project decision. 5. Active implementation/review work. 6. Informational Pod status and restorable historical sessions. ## Visual design The concrete look-and-feel should follow the existing TUI design language rather than inventing a second product surface. Reuse current terminal UI conventions for borders, list selection, status/action bars, composer placement, key-hint style, transient notices, color/status semantics, and attach/return behavior where possible. The panel should feel like a more capable `--multi` workspace view, not a new unrelated dashboard. Any new visual treatment for Ticket/action rows or timeline lanes should be a small extension of existing list/detail components, so the single-Pod UI, current multi-Pod view, and workspace panel remain visually coherent. ## State sources and socket boundary Unlike the normal single-Pod TUI, the panel should not treat a Pod socket transcript as its primary state. The default display can be built from local project records plus lightweight Pod state: - `.yoi/tickets/` is authoritative for Ticket records, status, thread events, plans, implementation reports, reviews, closures, and umbrella/child relationships. - Pod metadata/session state is used to show related live/restorable role Pods. - Visible Pod/client operations are used at action boundaries: restore/spawn Orchestrator, launch Intake, notify/send to a Pod, or attach to a selected Pod. So the panel itself is local-file-first and does not need to own a long-lived socket as its main state source. It still uses client/socket APIs for operations that actually target live Pods or attach to a transcript. ## UI intermediate representation Use a thin UI-oriented intermediate representation. It is a render/action-dispatch contract, not a new Ticket backend, scheduler, or state machine. ```text WorkspacePanelViewModel - header: workspace label, companion state, orchestrator state, diagnostics - rows: ordered display rows for user actions, Tickets, and secondary Pod/session entries - detail: selected item detail blocks - timeline: optional dependency/phase lanes - composer: current target, placeholder, send eligibility, hints ``` Rows should carry only display-ready fields plus stable IDs for follow-up actions: ```text PanelRow - key: stable selection/action key - kind: intake | ticket | review | blocked | pod | diagnostic - title / subtitle - status marker and priority - next user action, if any - related Ticket id/slug, if any - related Pod names, if any - disabled reason / key hints ``` Ticket-specific rows can be backed by a compact entry: ```text TicketPanelEntry - id / slug / title / status - current phase: intake | preflight | implementing | reviewing | close_ready | blocked | closed - next user action: clarify | go | review | close | wait | none - parent/child relationship - related role Pods and their live/restorable state - latest plan / implementation report / review summary excerpts - diagnostics and blocked reason ``` Keep this intentionally thin: - Do not duplicate the Ticket backend state machine in the UI. - Do not load full Markdown thread bodies into the default view model. - Do not let render functions perform Ticket/Pod I/O. - Do not execute mutations from stale view-model data alone; action dispatch should re-check the relevant Ticket/Pod authority before mutating. ## Relationship to `--multi` and normal TUI Reuse the useful `--multi` behaviors: - discover visible live/restorable Pods; - show live/stopped/working state; - choose a send/attach target; - attach to a Pod/session and return to the workspace panel; - keep background Pods alive when the panel exits. Do not embed the normal single-Pod UI as a permanent second pane. The panel should drill into a selected Pod/session only when the user explicitly attaches. This avoids maintaining two simultaneous chat surfaces and keeps normal Pod history ownership unchanged. ## Composer target model The composer has an explicit target selector: - `Companion`: management chat for this workspace panel session. - `New Intake`: send the composer body as the initial user input of a new Ticket Intake Pod. - `Selected Ticket`: record a comment/decision/Go/review-style action against the selected Ticket, usually via Ticket tools or an Orchestrator notification. - `Selected Pod`: advanced/direct send or attach path, not the main workflow. Dynamic user text must be committed to the destination authority: - Companion text goes to Companion history. - New Intake text goes to the Intake Pod initial user input/history. - Ticket decisions/comments go to Ticket records and/or the Pod that receives the actual message. - Nothing should be injected only into hidden context. ## Action dispatcher boundary The view model tells the UI what can be displayed and which actions appear available. It should not be the mutation authority. When a user triggers an action, the dispatcher should use the selected stable key to re-read or re-check the relevant authority before acting: ```text selection key + action intent → re-check Ticket / Pod authority → run Ticket tool, client method, restore/spawn, send, or attach → rebuild view model from local files and Pod state ``` This keeps the panel responsive while avoiding stale UI state becoming a hidden source of truth. ## Timeline / Gantt-like view A useful first version is a phase/dependency timeline rather than a date-based scheduler: ```text yoi-local-ticket-backend-migration ├─ ✓ yoi-ticket-cli-parity ├─ ✓ builtin-yoi-local-ticket-backend-config ├─ ✓ migrate-ticket-storage-to-yoi-tickets └─ ✓ remove-tickets-sh workspace-orchestration-panel ├─ ▶ workspace-orchestration-panel-design ├─ ○ workspace-panel-orchestrator-lifecycle ├─ ○ workspace-panel-composer-targets ├─ ○ ticket-intake-orchestrator-handoff └─ ○ workspace-panel-action-model ``` Per-ticket phase lanes can show progress without pretending the system has reliable time estimates: ```text Ticket Intake Preflight Implement Review Close panel design ▶ ○ ○ ○ ○ composer ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ action model ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ``` This captures what currently matters most: dependency order, gate state, responsible Pods, and human decision points. Duration/ETA scheduling can be added later if the backend starts recording enough authoritative timing data. ## Orchestrator lifecycle When the workspace panel opens, restore or spawn a workspace Orchestrator named from the workspace directory, e.g. `-orchestrator`. The panel should display its state but should not own its lifetime; closing the panel leaves the Orchestrator running. Intake Pods receive the Orchestrator handoff/notification target at launch so they can report clarified Ticket readiness without automatically starting implementation. The Orchestrator may prepare routing/preflight, but human Go remains an explicit action. ## Initial implementation boundary Implement in this order: 1. Define the thin UI intermediate representation (`WorkspacePanelViewModel`, `PanelRow`, `TicketPanelEntry`, composer target/view state, timeline lane rows). 2. Add a local-file-first adapter that builds the view model from `.yoi/tickets/`, role-launch state, visible Pod metadata, and diagnostics. 3. Render the workspace panel using existing TUI visual conventions/components as much as possible. 4. Make the existing multi-Pod panel path consume enough of that model to show action-prioritized Ticket rows. 5. Add composer target selection for Companion vs New Intake. 6. Add action dispatch with re-checks against Ticket/Pod authority before mutation. 7. Add attach/drill-down and return behavior for related Pods. 8. Add the phase/dependency timeline view. The existing `:ticket ...` commands remain as low-level fallback and debugging affordances, not the primary UX.