## 作成 LocalTicketBackend によって作成されました。 --- ## State changed Ticket を `workspace-panel` が queued にしました。 --- ## Decision Routing decision: implementation_ready_parallel Reason: - Panel Queue により、この Ticket は Orchestrator routing 対象として明示許可された。 - User standing directive: blocker が無いものは並列実行する。現在の `00001KVJABS1A` review と WebFetch PDF work とは別 domain の prompt/workflow resource修正であり、直接 conflict はないため並列化できる。 - Ticket body は Intake role prompt / workflow の弱点、Ticket 化前調査 gate、draft-before-create、user agreement gate、spike/requirements_sync handling、stale vocabulary removal、Intake boundaries を実装可能な粒度で定義している。 - 未解決 relation blocker はない。 - Orchestrator worktree は clean、matching branch/worktree はなし。 - Risk domain は prompt-context / workflow-source / role-behavior / ticket-authority だが、Ticket は Intake が coder/reviewer/helper Pod を起動しないこと、implementation routing/merge/closeをしないこと、user agreement without official Ticket create ruleを維持することを明示している。bounded context check 後も implementation 前に必要な追加 human decision は見つからなかった。 Evidence checked: - Ticket `00001KVJDJD02` body / thread / relations / artifacts。 - `TicketRelationQuery(00001KVJDJD02)`: no blockers。 - `TicketOrchestrationPlanQuery(00001KVJDJD02)`: no previous plan records; accepted plan recorded now。 - Workspace state: - Orchestrator worktree clean at `36b9ed45`。 - queued: `00001KVJA7V2R`, `00001KVJDJD02`。 - inprogress: `00001KVJABS1A` review only。 - no matching Intake workflow branch/worktree。 IntentPacket: Intent: - Strengthen Intake model-facing role/workflow guidance so ambiguous requests go through a minimum investigation gate before official Ticket creation。 - Make Intake separate user claims, confirmed facts, unverified hypotheses, and undecided points in drafts/Tickets。 Binding decisions / invariants: - Intake remains non-scheduler and must not spawn coder/reviewer/read-only investigation helper Pods。 - Intake must not create implementation worktrees, route implementation/review, merge, or close。 - User agreement before official Ticket creation remains required。 - Do not save user claims, confirmed facts, unverified hypotheses, and undecided points as if they are all requirements。 - Preserve prompt/workflow resource boundaries between bundled resources and workspace override; explain intended differences if they remain。 - Remove or replace stale `Action required` / `Attention required` vocabulary in draft templates with current Ticket-operation language。 Requirements / acceptance criteria: - Intake prompt/workflow explicitly states when to inspect existing Tickets / workflows / relevant files before TicketCreate。 - If investigation is needed, Intake can stop at draft / `spike_needed` / `requirements_sync_needed` rather than official Ticket creation。 - `resources/prompts/role/intake.md`, `resources/workflows/ticket-intake-workflow.md`, and `.yoi/workflow/ticket-intake-workflow.md` are reconciled or their differences are intentional/clear。 - Ticket作成前 user agreement rule is preserved。 - Validation includes prompt/workflow diff review and `git diff --check`; run TicketDoctor if Ticket consistency needs checking。 Next action: - Record `queued -> inprogress` and commit Ticket records before creating implementation worktree and spawning Coder。 --- ## State changed Ticket body/thread, relation metadata, Orchestrator worktree state, visible Pods, existing branch/worktree, and bounded Intake prompt/workflow context were checked. There is no unresolved blocking dependency, no conflicting inprogress implementation, and no missing planning decision. Accepting this queued Ticket for parallel implementation before worktree/Pod side effects. --- ## Implementation report Implementation orchestration start: - Acceptance records were committed on Orchestrator branch: `e752a720 ticket: accept webfetch pdf and intake gate`。 - Created implementation worktree `/home/hare/Projects/yoi/.worktree/00001KVJDJD02-intake-investigation-gate` on branch `impl/00001KVJDJD02-intake-investigation-gate` at `e752a720`。 - Spawned Coder Pod `yoi-coder-00001KVJDJD02` with write scope limited to the implementation worktree and read-only root scope only for runtime workspace identity。 - Coder task explicitly forbids root/original workspace implementation, Intake helper Pod spawning behavior changes, implementation routing/merge/close scope creep, merge, Ticket close, and cleanup。 Next action: - Wait for Coder implementation report, then inspect branch diff/validation evidence and route to Reviewer。 --- ## Implementation report Coder implementation report received from `yoi-coder-00001KVJDJD02`. Implementation commit: - `1143ae1c workflow: add intake investigation gate` Changed areas reported: - `resources/prompts/role/intake.md`: - Added explicit minimum investigation gate before `TicketCreate` / material refinement。 - Reinforced user agreement before official Ticket creation。 - Added separation of user claims, confirmed facts, unverified hypotheses, and undecided points。 - Preserved Intake non-scheduler boundaries: no coder/reviewer/helper Pods, no worktrees, no routing/merge/close。 - `resources/workflows/ticket-intake-workflow.md`: - Expanded bundled workflow from thin pointer into concrete reusable Intake procedure。 - Added Ticket化前の最小調査ゲート。 - Added `spike_needed` / `requirements_sync_needed` draft stop behavior。 - Replaced stale `Action required` / `Attention required` draft wording with `Next Ticket operation`。 - Added recommended Ticket body sections for claims/facts/hypotheses/open questions。 - Documented bundled-vs-workspace workflow boundary。 - `.yoi/workflow/ticket-intake-workflow.md`: - Reconciled workspace override with bundled workflow while preserving dogfooding-specific details。 - Added explicit local investigation gate conditions and outputs。 - Updated draft template and Ticket body guidance。 - Clarified that workspace override may add Objective/split/local policy details but must not weaken bundled invariants。 Coder validation reported: - `git diff --check`: passed。 - Stale vocabulary grep for `Action required` / `Attention required` in touched prompt/workflow files: no matches。 - Investigation-gate grep confirmed new terms are present: - `minimum investigation gate` - `Ticket 化前の最小調査ゲート` - `spike_needed` - `requirements_sync_needed` - `Confirmed facts / sources` - `Unverified hypotheses` - `Undecided points / open questions` - Workflow/prompt test search: no dedicated workflow prompt tests found; only unrelated Dashboard test reference。 - No code tests run because changes are prompt/workflow Markdown only。 Known risks / deferrals: - No runtime schema/code changes were made。 - `.yoi/workflow/ticket-intake-workflow.md` intentionally remains a more detailed workspace override; bundled workflow is compact reusable baseline。 - `TicketDoctor` not run by Coder; no Ticket record structure was changed。 Orchestrator evidence checked before review dispatch: - Implementation worktree is clean。 - HEAD is `1143ae1c`。 - Diff from acceptance `e752a720..HEAD` is one implementation commit touching 3 files, 186 insertions / 19 deletions。 - `git diff --check e752a720..HEAD` produced no diagnostics。 Next action: - Dispatch Reviewer for r1 review against Ticket requirements, with focus on model-facing Intake behavior, Ticket化前 investigation gate clarity, user-agreement preservation, stale vocabulary removal, bundled/workspace workflow boundary, and Intake non-scheduler boundaries。 ---