## 作成 LocalTicketBackend によって作成されました。 --- ## Intake summary Panel から Quit するときに断続的な遅延が発生する問題について、調査・修正用 Ticket を作成した。現象は明確だが再現条件や遅延箇所は未特定のため readiness は `spike_needed`。Orchestrator はまず `crates/tui/src/multi_pod.rs` の Panel event loop / `PendingReload` / Quit handling / queue-attention notice dispatch / snapshot reload 周辺を調査し、Quit が非本質的な background work の完了待ちでブロックされない修正へ routing できる。関連 closed Ticket `00001KTFMMZP0` は Panel 非同期遷移改善で、今回の Quit 遅延とは別の follow-up として扱う。 --- ## State changed 要件・受け入れ条件・binding decisions・調査焦点が揃っており、Orchestrator が spike/実装修正へ routing できるため ready にする。 --- ## State changed Ticket を `workspace-panel` が queued にしました。 --- ## Decision Routing decision: spike_needed / queued_waiting_capacity Reason: - Ticket は `queued` で要件は明確だが、readiness は `spike_needed`。遅延原因・再現条件・影響 async path は未特定で、まず `crates/tui/src/multi_pod.rs` の Panel event loop / `PendingReload` / Quit handling / queue-attention notice dispatch / snapshot reload 周辺の code-path analysis が必要。 - `TicketRelationQuery` と `TicketOrchestrationPlanQuery` で durable blocker はなかったが、この queue review では `00001KV072V89`（Workspace panel mouse selection）を先に inprogress 受理した。 - `00001KV0723PC` と `00001KV072V89` はどちらも Panel / `multi_pod.rs` の event/input/render/reload surface に触れる可能性が高く、同時 child worktree で進めると conflict risk と reviewer bottleneck が大きい。 - `00001KV04NJ8D` は single-Pod rewind / Pod protocol 周辺の別 surface として parallel start 可能なため、現在の capacity は `00001KV072V89` と `00001KV04NJ8D` に割り当てる。 Evidence checked: - Ticket body / thread / artifacts（artifacts なし）。 - relation records: なし。 - orchestration plan records: この routing pass で `00001KV072V89` との `conflicts_with` と waiting-capacity note を記録。 - related closed Ticket `00001KTFMMZP0`: Panel non-blocking transition work は closed で、`PendingReload` / background refresh / attach-return path の背景として関連するが、今回の Quit 遅延とは別 follow-up。 - code map: `crates/tui/src/multi_pod.rs` の run loop、`PendingReload`、Quit action、queue-attention notice dispatch、terminal event poll/reload interaction。 - workspace/Pod state: Orchestrator worktree clean。implementation Pods はまだ起動していないが、この routing pass で 2 件を受理予定。 Next action: - この Ticket は queued のまま保持する。 - `00001KV072V89` の branch が統合されるか、panel surface conflict が低いと再評価できた時点で、改めて `queued -> inprogress` 受理を検討する。 - 受理時の first step は read-only/code-path spike とし、Quit が pending background work / notice dispatch / snapshot reload で block される path を特定してから修正する。 Escalate if: - Quit 遅延の修正が terminal cleanup、Pod lifecycle authority、Ticket workflow semantics、または broad TUI runtime-loop redesign を必要とする場合。 - 原因が Panel 外（OS terminal / shell / external command / specific provider/network）にある証拠が出た場合。 --- ## Decision Queue attention reviewed: no duplicate start. Actual state check: - `00001KV072V89` is `inprogress` with live spawned child `coder-00001KV072V89-panel-mouse` and worktree `/home/hare/Projects/yoi/.worktree/panel-mouse-selection`. - `00001KV04NJ8D` is `inprogress` with live spawned child `coder-00001KV04NJ8D-rewind` and worktree `/home/hare/Projects/yoi/.worktree/rewind-live-refresh`. - This Ticket remains `queued`. - `TicketRelationQuery` still shows no durable dependency blockers, but the existing OrchestrationPlan `conflicts_with` / `waiting_capacity_note` remains applicable: this Ticket likely touches the same Panel `multi_pod.rs` event-loop surface as `00001KV072V89` and should wait until that branch is integrated or conflict surface is re-evaluated. Decision: - Do not start another Coder Pod for this Ticket now. - Keep queued; re-evaluate after `00001KV072V89` completion/integration or explicit human override. --- ## Decision Routing decision: implementation_ready Reason: - Ticket は `queued` で、Quit 遅延の原因特定と修正の intent / requirements / acceptance criteria / binding invariants / implementation latitude / escalation conditions が揃っている。 - `readiness: spike_needed` だが、調査対象は `crates/tui/src/multi_pod.rs` の Panel event loop / `PendingReload` / Quit handling / queue-attention notice dispatch / snapshot reload 周辺に bounded されており、専用 worktree の Coder に first-step code-path spike と修正を委ねられる。 - `TicketRelationQuery` に durable dependency blocker はない。 - 以前の OrchestrationPlan `conflicts_with` / `waiting_capacity_note` は `00001KV072V89`（Panel mouse selection）との同時編集 conflict を理由に queued 待機としていたが、同 Ticket は review/merge/validation/cleanup 済みで `done`。現在の Orchestrator worktree は clean で、related implementation Pods/worktrees も cleanup 済み。 - risk flags は `tui-panel` / `shutdown-latency` / `async-cancellation` だが、Ticket は Quit の authority/invariants と escalation conditions を明記しており、実装前に追加の human decision は不要。 Evidence checked: - Ticket body / thread / artifacts。 - relation records: なし。 - orchestration plan records: 既存 `conflicts_with` / `waiting_capacity_note` を確認し、blocking condition（`00001KV072V89` の未統合）は解消済み。 - related Ticket `00001KTFMMZP0`: Panel non-blocking transition work は closed で、`PendingReload` / background refresh / attach-return path の背景として参照する。 - current code/workspace state: `00001KV072V89` と `00001KV04NJ8D` は merge/validation/cleanup 済み。Orchestrator worktree clean。visible spawned implementation Pods なし。 IntentPacket: Intent: - `yoi panel` / workspace Panel の Quit 操作で、ユーザー入力後に Panel の background reload / notice dispatch / snapshot load / Pod observation など非本質的処理待ちによる断続的な遅延が起きないよう、原因を特定して修正する。 Binding decisions / invariants: - Quit はユーザーの明示的な終了意思であり、Panel の観測/reload/通知送信完了待ちで遅延してはならない。 - 端末状態復旧、描画 backend の正常終了、Rust drop による安全な abort など、最小限の終了処理は維持する。 - Ticket lifecycle authority、Pod authority boundary、Panel row/action semantics、Companion/Orchestrator composer target semantics は変更しない。 - `resources/prompts` や durable Ticket schema 変更は想定しない。必要になった場合は escalation。 Requirements / acceptance criteria: - `Ctrl+C` / `Ctrl+D` など現行 Quit 経路が pending background work によって目に見えて遅延しない。 - 遅延原因と修正方針を implementation report に説明する。 - 可能な範囲で unit test / regression test を追加し、Quit 経路が pending background work にブロックされないことを検証する。 - 自動化が難しい場合は manual validation 手順と観測結果を report する。 Implementation latitude: - まず `crates/tui/src/multi_pod.rs` の event loop / `PendingReload` / Quit handling / terminal event polling / queue-attention notice dispatch / snapshot load を code-path spike する。 - 修正手段は、不要 await の回避、cancellable background work の abort/drop、event-loop priority adjustment、test seam 追加などから Coder が選んでよい。 - 再現が難しい場合は遅延し得る code path を単体再現できる test seam を優先してよい。 Escalate if: - Panel public UX、Ticket lifecycle semantics、Pod shutdown semantics、authority boundary の変更が必要になる。 - 端末 cleanup や Pod process lifecycle safety を犠牲にしないと遅延を解消できない。 - 原因が Panel 外（OS terminal / shell / external command / provider/network）にある証拠が出た。 Validation: - focused test for Quit not waiting on pending background work。 - `cargo fmt --check`。 - `git diff --check`。 - 変更範囲に応じて `cargo test -p tui ...` / `cargo check -p tui --all-targets`。 - 可能なら manual `yoi panel` Quit observation を report。 Current code map: - `crates/tui/src/multi_pod.rs`: Panel run loop、Quit key handling、`PendingReload`、background reload / attention notice / snapshot observation paths。 - `crates/tui/src/workspace_panel.rs`: ViewModel は参照のみ。row/action semantics は変更しない。 Critical risks / reviewer focus: - Quit を速くするために terminal cleanup / safe abort / Pod lifecycle を壊していないこと。 - nonessential background work が Quit を block しないこと。 - Panel/Ticket/Pod authority semantics と row/action semantics が変わっていないこと。 - Regression test が実際に pending background work block を防ぐ性質を持つこと。 --- ## State changed Ticket evidence、relation records、existing OrchestrationPlan waiting/conflict notes、related completed Panel mouse integration、visible Pod/worktree state、and clean Orchestrator workspace were checked. The prior conflict/capacity blocker is resolved; no durable dependency blockers remain. Implementation can proceed in a dedicated child worktree with a first-step code-path spike and focused regression test before changing Quit behavior. --- ## Implementation report Implementation report for Ticket 00001KV0723PC Commit: cfe411e50d7361228e509a18699477b13c4bc3e7 (`fix: avoid panel quit notice wait`) Observed / identified delay cause: - In `crates/tui/src/multi_pod.rs`, the workspace Panel run loop handled a completed `PendingReload` before polling terminal input. - When the reload result requested Orchestrator queue-attention notification, the loop awaited `dispatch_orchestrator_queue_attention_notice(request)` inline. - That dispatch path can wait on Unix socket connect/read/write operations and their timeouts. While it was awaited inline, queued terminal events such as `Ctrl+C` / `Ctrl+D` could not be observed, so an explicit Quit could be delayed by non-essential notice dispatch work. Fix summary: - Added `PendingQueueAttentionNotice`, a cancellable background task wrapper for queue-attention notice dispatch. - Changed the Panel run loop to start queue-attention notice dispatch asynchronously after reload and only harvest the result when the task is already finished. - Added explicit quit cleanup through `abort_panel_background_work_for_quit`, aborting both pending reload and pending queue-attention notice work before returning `MultiPodOutcome::Quit`. - Also abort the background notice before foreground open/action paths that already abort reload work, so non-essential notice dispatch does not contend with user-directed operations. - Preserved terminal/backend shutdown behavior by keeping the existing return path and relying on explicit abort plus Rust `Drop` cleanup for background tasks. Files changed: - `crates/tui/src/multi_pod.rs` Regression coverage: - Added `multi_quit_aborts_background_reload_and_notice_without_waiting`, which starts never-completing reload and notice tasks, exercises the quit abort helper under a timeout, and verifies both tasks are cancelled. - Existing reload overlap behavior remains covered by `multi_poll_reload_does_not_overlap_in_flight_reload`. Validation commands/results: - `cargo fmt --check` — passed - `git diff --check` — passed - `cargo test -p tui multi_quit_aborts_background_reload_and_notice_without_waiting --lib` — passed - `cargo test -p tui multi_poll_reload_does_not_overlap_in_flight_reload --lib` — passed - `cargo check -p tui --all-targets` — passed Residual risks / manual validation notes: - No broad runtime-loop rewrite was done. Foreground user-directed operations that are already awaited by the Panel can still occupy the loop; this change targets the identified non-essential background notice dispatch delay path. - I did not run an interactive manual `yoi panel` session from this Coder environment. Recommended manual check: start `yoi panel`, trigger a reload/queued Ticket condition that would dispatch queue-attention notice, then press `Ctrl+C`/`Ctrl+D` while the notice target is slow or unavailable; the Panel should exit promptly while terminal state is restored. --- ## Review: approve Review: approve Evidence: - Reviewed Ticket intent/criteria and `git diff 9dacc90e..HEAD` for commits `cfe411e5` and `8de82836`. - The reported delay cause is plausible in the previous loop shape: a completed reload was processed before input polling and could inline-await queue-attention notice dispatch; that dispatch uses Pod socket connect/read/write paths, so queued `Ctrl+C` / `Ctrl+D` input could wait behind nonessential notice work. - The implementation changes only `crates/tui/src/multi_pod.rs` plus the implementation report. Queue-attention notice dispatch is now wrapped in a cancellable `PendingQueueAttentionNotice`, started in the background, and harvested only after completion. Reload dispatch is guarded against overlap. - Quit handling now calls `abort_panel_background_work_for_quit`, aborting pending reload and pending queue-attention notice tasks before returning the existing `MultiPodOutcome::Quit`; this keeps the established terminal/backend cleanup return path intact. - Existing foreground open/action helper paths also abort the nonessential pending notice before returning user-directed outcomes, so stale notice dispatch does not block those paths. - No Ticket lifecycle authority, Pod authority boundary, Panel row/action semantics, composer target semantics, prompt resources, or Ticket schema changes were introduced. - The regression test starts never-completing reload and notice futures, exercises the quit abort helper under a timeout, and verifies cancellation of both tasks. This is a meaningful regression for the pending-background-work latency path rather than only checking that a helper was wired. Validation performed: - `cargo test -p tui multi_quit_aborts_background_reload_and_notice_without_waiting --lib` — passed. - `cargo test -p tui multi_poll_reload_does_not_overlap_in_flight_reload --lib` — passed. - `cargo fmt --check` — passed. - `git diff --check` — passed. - `cargo check -p tui --all-targets` — passed. Risks / notes: - I did not run an interactive `yoi panel` manual latency check. The code-path review and focused tests cover the identified nonessential reload/notice wait path. ---