## 作成 LocalTicketBackend によって作成されました。 --- ## Intake summary 既存 Ticket を精査し、重複ではなく実装可能な concrete work item と判断した。目的は `action_required` / `attention_required` を current Ticket schema、TicketCreate/TicketList/TicketShow などの tool/API output、Panel action 判定から削除し、routing を止める不足は `state: planning`・typed thread reason・relation metadata に寄せること。非目標は typed relation metadata / Objective / 新しい Panel 確認 UX / planning-return policy 全体の再設計。リスク/レビュー重点は ticket-schema、tool-api、panel-behavior、workflow/docs 更新、legacy/current record compatibility。実装は current output から両 field を消し、ready Ticket の Queue 判定を `attention_required` に依存させず、既存 docs/workflows/tests/examples の current 記述を更新し、historical audit mention は残してよい。検証は Ticket doctor、focused Ticket/Panel/tool output tests、cargo fmt --check、git diff --check、必要に応じて `nix build .#yoi` を含める。関連する既存作業として explicit workflow state 導入 `20260606-215403-001`、YAML frontmatter strict 化 `20260607-223233-001`、Panel close safety `20260608-032200-001`、Ticket state commit policy `20260607-220606-001` を確認済みで、いずれもこの Ticket の duplicate ではない。 --- ## State changed Intake classified this Ticket as ready to queue: the purpose, schema/tool/panel/doc scope, non-goals, acceptance criteria, validation expectations, and migration/compatibility boundary are explicit enough for Orchestrator routing. --- ## State changed Ticket を `workspace-panel` が queued にしました。 --- ## Decision Routing decision: waiting_for_active_tool_api_migration This Ticket is queued and appears implementation-ready, but I am intentionally not accepting it to `inprogress` yet. Reason: - `20260609-093050-001` (`Tool実行にToolExecutionContextを渡す`) is already active, with Coder Pod `coder-tool-execution-context` running in `.worktree/tool-execution-context`. - This Ticket touches Ticket schema, Ticket tool API output/input, and Panel action behavior. - Running it in parallel with a core Tool execution API migration would create avoidable conflict across tool/Ticket surfaces and make review less reliable. State decision: - Leave this Ticket `queued`. - Do not create a worktree or spawn a coder yet. Next action: - Complete and merge `20260609-093050-001` first. - Re-read this Ticket after that lands, then accept from queued if still unblocked. --- ## Decision Routing decision update: still_waiting_due_surface_overlap The user asked to prefer parallel work when conflicts are absent or expected to be small. I re-evaluated this Ticket under that policy and am still leaving it queued. Reason: - This Ticket removes `action_required` / `attention_required` from Ticket schema/tool API/Panel behavior. - `20260609-085212-001` now runs in parallel and also changes TicketList/tool output. - `20260609-084725-001` now runs in parallel and changes Panel behavior/key/display. - Running this cleanup at the same time would overlap both active Ticket tool output and Panel behavior surfaces; this is more than a small mechanical conflict. State decision: - Leave this Ticket `queued`. - Re-read and route it after either TicketList output slimming or Panel display work lands, depending on which surface remains active. --- ## State changed Accepted queued implementation after TicketList and Panel display work landed and workspace is clean. This Ticket removes obsolete action/attention fields from current Ticket schema/tool/API/panel behavior and can proceed in parallel with Profile feature-flag work because expected conflicts are small/manageable. --- ## Decision Routing decision: implementation_ready_parallel Reason: - The earlier blockers are resolved: ToolExecutionContext, TicketList output slimming, and Panel composer/display work have landed. - This Ticket is a bounded Ticket schema/API/panel cleanup to remove obsolete `action_required` and `attention_required` fields. - It can run in parallel with Profile feature flags work because expected overlap is small/manageable. IntentPacket: Intent: - Remove `action_required` and `attention_required` from current Ticket schema/tool/API/panel behavior, replacing any remaining current behavior with existing state/relation/orchestration-plan concepts where appropriate. Binding decisions / invariants: - New/current Ticket frontmatter must not include `action_required` or `attention_required`. - Current parser/schema/tool/CLI/panel surfaces must not expose those fields as current metadata. - Existing local Ticket records must be migrated to remove the fields. - Do not replace them with another generic vague field. - Use canonical `state`, Ticket relations, OrchestrationPlan waiting/blocker notes, and thread events for concrete state/context where appropriate. - Historical thread/resolution prose may remain audit history unless it is a current fixture or maintained guidance. - Do not change Ticket identity, lifecycle state model, relation metadata semantics, or Objective semantics. - Do not implement a broad panel UX redesign here. Reviewer focus: - Verify all current frontmatter records are migrated. - Verify TicketCreate/List/Show/tool schemas and Panel view models no longer carry action/attention fields. - Verify maintained guidance no longer treats these fields as current authority. - Verify doctor catches obsolete fields if appropriate. Validation: - Focused Ticket schema/parser/writer/tool tests. - Focused yoi CLI/list/show tests and panel/view model tests if touched. - `cargo fmt --check`, `git diff --check`, `cargo run -q -p yoi -- ticket doctor`, `cargo check --workspace`, `nix build .#yoi`. --- ## Implementation report Implementation routing started in parallel with the Profile feature-flag work. Worktree/branch: - Worktree: `.worktree/remove-action-attention-ticket-fields` - Branch: `remove-action-attention-ticket-fields` - Base/routing commit: `41133e0 ticket: route feature flags and attention cleanup` Spawned sibling Coder Pod: - `coder-remove-action-attention-ticket-fields` - Scope: non-recursive read on parent workspace root plus recursive write limited to the child worktree. Parallel-routing rationale: - ToolExecutionContext, TicketList, and Panel work have landed. - This Ticket is primarily Ticket schema/tool/API/panel metadata cleanup. - It is expected to have only small/manageable overlap with Profile feature-flag work. ---