--- title: "Improve Pod notification injection guidance" state: "planning" created_at: "2026-06-07T07:33:13Z" updated_at: "2026-06-07T07:33:13Z" --- ## Background During long orchestration sessions, spawned Pod completion notifications can arrive as system-injected messages. Although the notification says it is not a blocking request, the assistant may still respond with conversational phrasing that appears to answer the notification or stale user context, rather than clearly reporting the notification-handling result. This is especially noticeable in long contexts where multiple similar ticket/worktree/Pod reports are present. The issue appears more like notification framing/turn-target ambiguity than a direct task failure. ## Goal Improve the system-injected Pod notification wording so the assistant is guided to handle notifications as background events and report concrete handling results, not respond as if the notification were a user message. ## Requirements - Review current Pod notification injection text for spawned Pod finished/shutdown events. - Adjust wording to more strongly distinguish notifications from user requests. - Add guidance for the assistant's next response after handling a notification, e.g.: - do not answer the notification as if it were a user message; - if you choose to handle it now, read the Pod output and report the action taken; - summarize which Pod was handled, what changed, and what remains pending; - otherwise continue the current user task and handle the notification later. - Keep notification text concise enough not to bloat context excessively. - Preserve the existing policy that notifications are not blocking and should not force polling/wait loops. - Ensure wording does not authorize extra workflow actions, merges, ticket closes, or cleanup solely because a notification arrived. - Add/update tests or prompt snapshot tests for notification text if such tests exist. ## Non-goals - Redesigning the Pod event protocol. - Implementing typed hidden event channels. - Solving all long-context degradation issues. - Changing tool behavior or automatic notification handling policy. ## Acceptance criteria - Pod notification injection text clearly frames notifications as background events, not user turns. - The text gives concrete response-shaping guidance for notification-handling reports. - Existing orchestration policy remains: verify output/evidence before treating child work complete, and do not start/merge/close solely from a notification. - Tests/snapshots are updated where applicable.