--- id: 20260605-210704-workspace-orchestration-panel-design slug: workspace-orchestration-panel-design title: Workspace orchestration panel design status: open kind: task priority: P1 labels: [tui, design, orchestration, panel] created_at: 2026-06-05T21:07:04Z updated_at: 2026-06-05T21:32:54Z assignee: null legacy_ticket: null --- ## Background The next TUI should not be another small `:` command extension. The desired feature is a workspace-scoped orchestration panel with explicit Companion/Intake composer targets, background Orchestrator lifecycle, Intake handoff, and a user-action-oriented model. ## Requirements Produce a design artifact that fixes: - panel entrypoint and relation to current `--multi`; - Companion lifecycle and identity; - workspace Orchestrator lifecycle and naming rule (`-orchestrator`); - composer target model: - Companion; - Ticket Intake; - how Intake launch avoids writing the user request into the Companion/current Pod history; - how Intake receives Orchestrator notification/handoff target; - action model priorities: - user response required; - Intake draft ready; - Ticket ready for Go; - blocked/action-required; - review/close/preflight decisions; - active background work; - informational Pod status; - Go semantics for a fixed Ticket; - relationship to existing `:ticket ...` command fallback; - failure/diagnostic behavior; - implementation sequence. ## Non-goals - Code implementation. - Generic scheduler/lease/queue. - Automatic implementation without Go/authorization. - Replacing Ticket workflows. ## Acceptance criteria - A design artifact exists under this Ticket's `artifacts/` directory. - The artifact defines the state/action model and responsibility boundaries clearly enough to implement child tickets. - The artifact defines a UI intermediate representation between runtime/domain state and rendering. - The artifact specifies that the concrete visual design follows existing TUI conventions/components rather than inventing a separate dashboard style. - The artifact explicitly preserves history/context rules: dynamic messages are committed to the destination Pod history, not injected into hidden context. - Reviewer or parent approves the design before implementation child tickets proceed.