## 作成 LocalTicketBackend によって作成されました。 --- ## Plan ## Intake refinement 既存 Ticket 本文・thread・artifacts を確認した。artifacts はなく、thread は作成イベントのみ。 ### Readiness - readiness: implementation_ready - open_questions: なし - risk_flags: [worktree-layout, ticket-backend, panel-launcher, prompt-workflow-guidance, authority-boundary, merge-completion, cleanup] ### Orchestrator / Reviewer focus - Orchestrator の `pwd`、Ticket backend root、original workspace root、implementation worktree root を混同しないこと。 - implementation branch に orchestration branch の Ticket churn を混ぜないこと。 - merge-ready dossier は停止点ではなく checkpoint とし、standing merge authority・reviewer approval・safe target workspace・未解決 human gate なしが揃う場合だけ merge / validation / close or done / cleanup まで進めること。 - `resources/prompts/*`、`.yoi/workflow/*`、Panel/role launcher の実装が相互に矛盾しないこと。 - filesystem Ticket backend 前提の運用分離であり、Git 外 Ticket store 移行や push 自動化は非目標として維持すること。 ### Validation focus - targeted tests または workflow-level validation で cwd/backend/root 分離を確認すること。 - `target/debug/yoi ticket doctor` を通すこと。 - コード・runtime resource・prompt 変更が含まれるため、完了前に `nix build .#yoi` を通すこと。 --- ## Intake summary 既存 Ticket 00001KTTB479X は実装・レビュー可能な粒度まで要件化済み。目的は Orchestrator を専用 orchestration worktree で実行し、implementation worktree は original workspace root 配下の sibling `.worktree/` に作る運用・実装・prompt/workflow guidance を整えること。blocking open question はなし。主な risk flags は worktree-layout, ticket-backend, panel-launcher, prompt-workflow-guidance, authority-boundary, merge-completion, cleanup。Orchestrator は cwd/backend/root 分離、orchestration Ticket churn の混入防止、merge-completion authority 条件、prompt/workflow 整合性を重点確認して routing できる。 --- ## State changed Intake refinement により、本文・thread・artifacts を確認し、blocking open question がない implementation_ready Ticket と判断した。ユーザーが panel で queue した後、Orchestrator が routing できる状態にする。 --- ## State changed Ticket を `workspace-panel` が queued にしました。 --- ## State changed Queue acceptance: unrelated dirty code/profile diffs were identified as stale reverted reviewer-blocker changes from the prior Ticket and were restored before acceptance. The remaining dirty state is this Ticket's workspace-panel queue update. Relation query has no blockers, orchestration-plan query has no existing records, and the Ticket is implementation_ready with explicit requirements for orchestration worktree / original workspace root / merge-completion guidance. Implementation side effects may proceed after this recorded acceptance. --- ## Plan Routing decision: implementation_ready Reason: - Ticket is `queued`; user/panel authorized routing and user has given standing authorization to continue through merge-completion when reviewer approval and safety conditions hold. - Relation query has no blockers and orchestration-plan query has no existing records. - Workspace dirty state was checked. Stale bad role-profile diffs from the previous Ticket were restored; remaining dirty state was this Ticket's queued update. - Ticket body and Intake refinement contain concrete requirements, acceptance criteria, non-goals, validation focus, and risk flags. Evidence checked: - Ticket body/thread/artifacts. - `TicketRelationQuery`: no blockers. - `TicketOrchestrationPlanQuery`: no records before this routing pass. - Workspace/worktree/branch state: main worktree only before acceptance. - Visible Pods: no active implementation child Pods. IntentPacket: - Intent: make Orchestrator execution and implementation worktree creation explicitly distinguish orchestration worktree cwd/ticket backend from the original workspace root and target merge workspace. - Binding decisions / invariants: filesystem Ticket backend remains; no Git-external Ticket store; main workspace draft Tickets must not be implicit Orchestrator queue; implementation worktrees are siblings under original workspace root `.worktree/` and must not be nested under Orchestrator cwd; implementation branches must not include orchestration Ticket churn; prompt/workflow guidance must not reintroduce dossier stop when standing merge authority/safe target/reviewer approval/no human gate are present. - Requirements / acceptance criteria: record design/implementation policy; update Panel/launcher/workflow/prompt guidance as needed; testable handling of Orchestrator cwd, Ticket backend root, original workspace root, implementation worktree root, target workspace/branch, and cleanup policy; `target/debug/yoi ticket doctor`; code/runtime resource/prompt changes require `nix build .#yoi` before completion. - Implementation latitude: exact naming/reuse policy for orchestration worktrees and exact split between docs, prompts, workflow text, and launcher code can be chosen if the invariants and tests are met. - Escalate if implementation requires changing Ticket storage backend authority, introducing push automation, or weakening merge/reviewer/safe-workspace checks. - Validation: focused tests for launcher/worktree context and prompt/workflow text where practical, `cargo fmt --check`, `git diff --check`, `target/debug/yoi ticket doctor`, and `nix build .#yoi`. --- ## Implementation report Implementation report Branch/worktree: `orchestrator-worktree-layout` / `.worktree/orchestrator-worktree-layout` Commit: - `834caba2 feat: track orchestration workspace roots` Summary: - Added `docs/design/orchestrator-worktree-layout.md` to record the four-root model: `role_workspace_root`, `original_workspace_root`, `implementation_worktree_root`, and `merge_target_workspace_root`. - Extended `TicketRoleLaunchContext` / `TicketRoleLaunchPlan` with original/target workspace roots and derived implementation worktree root. - Orchestrator launch prompts now emit a `Workspace routing context` section so the model-visible task can distinguish the role runtime/Ticket backend root from original implementation and merge target roots. - Updated Orchestrator worktree-routing and merge-completion prompt resources so implementation worktrees are created under the recorded original workspace root and merge/cleanup runs against the recorded target workspace, not accidental process cwd. - Updated `worktree-workflow` to use `/.worktree/` and `git -C ...` instead of assuming the Orchestrator cwd is the repository root. - Adjusted client Ticket-role prompt tests to cover workspace routing context and standing merge-completion authority behavior. Validation run in branch: - `cargo fmt --check` passed. - `cargo test -p client ticket_role --lib` passed (18 passed). - `git diff --check` passed. - `/home/hare/Projects/yoi/target/debug/yoi ticket doctor` passed. - `nix build .#yoi` passed. Notes: - Panel/workspace orchestration can later populate `original_workspace_root` and `target_workspace_root` when launching an Orchestrator from a dedicated worktree. This branch adds the plan/prompt plumbing and workflow policy without changing Ticket storage backend authority or introducing Git-external project records. --- ## Review: request changes Branch-local review verdict: request_changes Blocker: - `.yoi/workflow/multi-agent-workflow.md` still contradicts the new root model. It still instructs creating `./.worktree/` relative to Orchestrator cwd and frames read/write authority, orchestration authority, merge, validation, and lifecycle around `main workspace` instead of recorded original/target workspace roots. Because this workflow is advertised/resident and referenced by the updated Orchestrator prompt, it can reintroduce old behavior despite the updated `worktree-workflow`. Non-blocking notes: - `TicketRoleLaunchContext` / `TicketRoleLaunchPlan` root plumbing is directionally correct and generated Orchestrator prompt output exposes `role_workspace_root`, `original_workspace_root`, `implementation_worktree_root`, and `merge_target_workspace_root`. - Production callers still construct `TicketRoleLaunchContext::new(workspace_root, TicketRole::Orchestrator)` without supplying distinct original/target roots. This can be a follow-up boundary, but the branch is not a complete dedicated-orchestration-worktree launch path yet. - Tests cover new prompt wording and standing merge-completion wording, but should more strongly assert plan field values and that `SpawnConfig` stays on `role_workspace_root` when original/target roots differ. Validation run by reviewer: - `cargo test -p client ticket_role --lib` passed (18 passed). - `git diff --check $(git merge-base HEAD develop)..HEAD` passed. - `/home/hare/Projects/yoi/target/debug/yoi ticket doctor` passed. - `nix build .#yoi --no-link` passed. No files were modified by reviewer. --- ## Implementation report Fix-loop implementation report Reviewer blocker fixed in amended implementation commit `e7c78f96`: - Updated `.yoi/workflow/multi-agent-workflow.md` so it no longer assumes Orchestrator cwd is the original repository root. - Multi-agent workflow now explicitly says implementation worktrees are created under the recorded original workspace root `.worktree`, and merge-completion runs against the recorded merge target workspace. - Replaced remaining `main workspace` merge/validation/Ticket-completion wording with recorded merge target / recorded Ticket backend wording where relevant. - Kept `.yoi` path-exclusion policy intact while clarifying Orchestrator workspace / Ticket backend authority boundaries. - Strengthened client tests to assert `TicketRoleLaunchPlan` root fields and that `SpawnConfig.workspace_root` remains the role runtime workspace root even when original/target roots differ. Validation after fix: - `cargo fmt --check` passed. - `cargo test -p client ticket_role --lib` passed (18 passed). - `git diff --check` passed. - `/home/hare/Projects/yoi/target/debug/yoi ticket doctor` passed. - `nix build .#yoi` passed. Reviewer `reviewer-orchestrator-worktree-layout` has been asked to re-review the amended branch. ---