# Review: unify reasoning block lifecycle Reviewer Pods: - Initial review: `reasoning-block-lifecycle-reviewer-20260603` - Re-review: `reasoning-block-lifecycle-rereviewer-20260603` ## Result Approved after fixes. No remaining blockers. ## Initial blocker The initial reviewer found that OpenAI Responses text-bearing reasoning items produced two live-visible Thinking lifecycles: 1. streamed `reasoning_text.delta` used the real Thinking block; 2. later `response.output_item.done` emitted a second synthetic empty Thinking block to carry persistence metadata. That preserved persistence but changed live callback/trace semantics beyond the intended event-model cleanup. ## Fix verification Coder added commit `abb6adb fix: preserve openai reasoning live stops`. The re-review confirmed: - text-bearing OpenAI reasoning now attaches `ReasoningBlockData` to the deferred existing Thinking block stop; - no second synthetic empty Thinking start/stop is emitted for text-bearing reasoning; - metadata-only OpenAI reasoning still persists through a synthetic metadata-bearing Thinking block when no live reasoning text block exists; - Anthropic signature/redacted material and OpenAI id/summary/encrypted_content remain carried through `ReasoningBlockData`; - the old `ReasoningItem` event/collector/Timeline side channel was not reintroduced. ## Validation evidence Coder reported: - `cargo test -p llm-worker --lib` - `cargo test -p llm-worker --test reasoning_round_trip_test` - `cargo check --workspace --all-targets` - `./tickets.sh doctor` - `git diff --check` - `nix build .#yoi` Parent/orchestrator reran after merge: - `cargo test -p llm-worker openai_responses::events::tests::reasoning --lib` - `cargo test -p llm-worker --lib` - `cargo test -p llm-worker --test reasoning_round_trip_test` - `cargo check --workspace --all-targets` - `./tickets.sh doctor` - `git diff --check` - `nix build .#yoi` - `./result/bin/yoi pod --help` ## Residual risk Low. OpenAI Responses reasoning-text block stop is intentionally delayed until `response.output_item.done` so provider persistence metadata can be attached to the same Thinking block lifecycle. The remaining edge risk is unusual ordering/error behavior around multiple concurrent Thinking scopes, but the implementation now keys Thinking scopes by block index and focused tests cover the reviewed duplicate-stop sequence.