## 作成 LocalTicketBackend によって作成されました。 --- ## Plan ## Intake refinement 既存 Ticket 本文・thread・artifacts を確認した。artifacts はなく、thread は作成イベントのみ。 ### Readiness - readiness: implementation_ready - open_questions: なし - risk_flags: [worktree-layout, ticket-backend, panel-launcher, prompt-workflow-guidance, authority-boundary, merge-completion, cleanup] ### Orchestrator / Reviewer focus - Orchestrator の `pwd`、Ticket backend root、original workspace root、implementation worktree root を混同しないこと。 - implementation branch に orchestration branch の Ticket churn を混ぜないこと。 - merge-ready dossier は停止点ではなく checkpoint とし、standing merge authority・reviewer approval・safe target workspace・未解決 human gate なしが揃う場合だけ merge / validation / close or done / cleanup まで進めること。 - `resources/prompts/*`、`.yoi/workflow/*`、Panel/role launcher の実装が相互に矛盾しないこと。 - filesystem Ticket backend 前提の運用分離であり、Git 外 Ticket store 移行や push 自動化は非目標として維持すること。 ### Validation focus - targeted tests または workflow-level validation で cwd/backend/root 分離を確認すること。 - `target/debug/yoi ticket doctor` を通すこと。 - コード・runtime resource・prompt 変更が含まれるため、完了前に `nix build .#yoi` を通すこと。 --- ## Intake summary 既存 Ticket 00001KTTB479X は実装・レビュー可能な粒度まで要件化済み。目的は Orchestrator を専用 orchestration worktree で実行し、implementation worktree は original workspace root 配下の sibling `.worktree/` に作る運用・実装・prompt/workflow guidance を整えること。blocking open question はなし。主な risk flags は worktree-layout, ticket-backend, panel-launcher, prompt-workflow-guidance, authority-boundary, merge-completion, cleanup。Orchestrator は cwd/backend/root 分離、orchestration Ticket churn の混入防止、merge-completion authority 条件、prompt/workflow 整合性を重点確認して routing できる。 --- ## State changed Intake refinement により、本文・thread・artifacts を確認し、blocking open question がない implementation_ready Ticket と判断した。ユーザーが panel で queue した後、Orchestrator が routing できる状態にする。 --- ## State changed Ticket を `workspace-panel` が queued にしました。 --- ## State changed Queue acceptance: unrelated dirty code/profile diffs were identified as stale reverted reviewer-blocker changes from the prior Ticket and were restored before acceptance. The remaining dirty state is this Ticket's workspace-panel queue update. Relation query has no blockers, orchestration-plan query has no existing records, and the Ticket is implementation_ready with explicit requirements for orchestration worktree / original workspace root / merge-completion guidance. Implementation side effects may proceed after this recorded acceptance. --- ## Plan Routing decision: implementation_ready Reason: - Ticket is `queued`; user/panel authorized routing and user has given standing authorization to continue through merge-completion when reviewer approval and safety conditions hold. - Relation query has no blockers and orchestration-plan query has no existing records. - Workspace dirty state was checked. Stale bad role-profile diffs from the previous Ticket were restored; remaining dirty state was this Ticket's queued update. - Ticket body and Intake refinement contain concrete requirements, acceptance criteria, non-goals, validation focus, and risk flags. Evidence checked: - Ticket body/thread/artifacts. - `TicketRelationQuery`: no blockers. - `TicketOrchestrationPlanQuery`: no records before this routing pass. - Workspace/worktree/branch state: main worktree only before acceptance. - Visible Pods: no active implementation child Pods. IntentPacket: - Intent: make Orchestrator execution and implementation worktree creation explicitly distinguish orchestration worktree cwd/ticket backend from the original workspace root and target merge workspace. - Binding decisions / invariants: filesystem Ticket backend remains; no Git-external Ticket store; main workspace draft Tickets must not be implicit Orchestrator queue; implementation worktrees are siblings under original workspace root `.worktree/` and must not be nested under Orchestrator cwd; implementation branches must not include orchestration Ticket churn; prompt/workflow guidance must not reintroduce dossier stop when standing merge authority/safe target/reviewer approval/no human gate are present. - Requirements / acceptance criteria: record design/implementation policy; update Panel/launcher/workflow/prompt guidance as needed; testable handling of Orchestrator cwd, Ticket backend root, original workspace root, implementation worktree root, target workspace/branch, and cleanup policy; `target/debug/yoi ticket doctor`; code/runtime resource/prompt changes require `nix build .#yoi` before completion. - Implementation latitude: exact naming/reuse policy for orchestration worktrees and exact split between docs, prompts, workflow text, and launcher code can be chosen if the invariants and tests are met. - Escalate if implementation requires changing Ticket storage backend authority, introducing push automation, or weakening merge/reviewer/safe-workspace checks. - Validation: focused tests for launcher/worktree context and prompt/workflow text where practical, `cargo fmt --check`, `git diff --check`, `target/debug/yoi ticket doctor`, and `nix build .#yoi`. ---