fix(merge-request): share immutable integration and requirement evidence

T-716: validate recorded source/approval/request identity, chronology and revocation independently of mutable selectors. Reuse exact revision and complete linked-source attestation in CompleteTicket. Assignment and lifecycle mutation are unchanged.\n\nValidation: cargo test -p merge-request (9 evidence and 21 store tests).
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-08 15:44:26 +09:00
parent b0d8c7b786
commit 4d0f2afc1e
3 changed files with 850 additions and 68 deletions
+251 -68
View File
@@ -236,10 +236,244 @@ pub struct MergeRequest {
#[serde(default)]
pub thread: Vec<MergeRequestThreadEvent>,
}
/// Bounded failures from pure evaluation of persisted review and merge evidence.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub enum MergeRequestEvidenceError {
NotMerged,
MergeResultMissing,
ApprovalMissing,
ApprovalRevoked,
ApprovalNotApproved,
ApprovalSourceMismatch,
ApprovalTimelineMismatch,
ReviewRequestMissing,
ReviewRequestMismatch,
ApprovalNotEffective,
ItemRevisionMismatch,
SourceSnapshotMismatch,
RequirementApprovalMissing,
}
impl MergeRequestEvidenceError {
/// Stable machine-readable diagnostic code, separate from the human message.
pub fn code(self) -> &'static str {
match self {
Self::NotMerged => "not_merged",
Self::MergeResultMissing => "merge_result_missing",
Self::ApprovalMissing => "approval_missing",
Self::ApprovalRevoked => "approval_revoked",
Self::ApprovalNotApproved => "approval_not_approved",
Self::ApprovalSourceMismatch => "approval_source_mismatch",
Self::ApprovalTimelineMismatch => "approval_timeline_mismatch",
Self::ReviewRequestMissing => "review_request_missing",
Self::ReviewRequestMismatch => "review_request_mismatch",
Self::ApprovalNotEffective => "approval_not_effective",
Self::ItemRevisionMismatch => "item_revision_mismatch",
Self::SourceSnapshotMismatch => "source_snapshot_mismatch",
Self::RequirementApprovalMissing => "requirement_approval_missing",
}
}
pub fn as_str(self) -> &'static str {
match self {
Self::NotMerged => "Merge Request has no merged result",
Self::MergeResultMissing => "merged Merge Request has no MergeResult",
Self::ApprovalMissing => "integration approval is missing",
Self::ApprovalRevoked => "Reviewer approval is revoked",
Self::ApprovalNotApproved => "Reviewer decision is not an approval",
Self::ApprovalSourceMismatch => "Reviewer approval does not match the exact source ref",
Self::ApprovalTimelineMismatch => {
"integration approval does not predate the merged result"
}
Self::ReviewRequestMissing => "linked ReviewRequested evidence is missing",
Self::ReviewRequestMismatch => {
"Reviewer approval does not match linked ReviewRequested evidence"
}
Self::ApprovalNotEffective => "Reviewer approval is not the effective review",
Self::ItemRevisionMismatch => {
"Reviewer approval does not attest the current Ticket revision"
}
Self::SourceSnapshotMismatch => {
"Reviewer approval does not attest the exact linked source set"
}
Self::RequirementApprovalMissing => {
"no effective Reviewer approval attests the current Ticket revision and exact linked source set"
}
}
}
}
impl std::fmt::Display for MergeRequestEvidenceError {
fn fmt(&self, formatter: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
formatter.write_str(self.as_str())
}
}
impl std::error::Error for MergeRequestEvidenceError {}
impl MergeRequest {
pub fn effective_review(&self, subject: &str) -> Option<&ReviewEvent> {
self.thread.iter().rev().find_map(|e|match e{MergeRequestThreadEvent::Review(v)if v.subject_ref==subject&&!self.thread.iter().any(|x|matches!(x,MergeRequestThreadEvent::ReviewRevoked(r)if r.review_event_id==v.event_id))=>Some(v),_=>None})
}
/// Returns the recorded merged result, without resolving selectors or mutating state.
pub fn merged_result(&self) -> Result<&MergeEvent, MergeRequestEvidenceError> {
if self.state != MergeRequestState::Merged {
return Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::NotMerged);
}
self.thread
.iter()
.rev()
.find_map(|event| match event {
MergeRequestThreadEvent::Merge(event) => Some(event),
_ => None,
})
.ok_or(MergeRequestEvidenceError::MergeResultMissing)
}
/// Validates the specific approval recorded by the merged result. A later
/// requirement review does not replace this integration evidence.
pub fn integration_approval(&self) -> Result<&ReviewEvent, MergeRequestEvidenceError> {
let merge = self.merged_result()?;
let review = self
.thread
.iter()
.find_map(|event| match event {
MergeRequestThreadEvent::Review(review)
if review.event_id == merge.approval_event_id =>
{
Some(review)
}
_ => None,
})
.ok_or(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalMissing)?;
if merge.approved_source_ref.trim().is_empty()
|| review.subject_ref != merge.approved_source_ref
{
return Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalSourceMismatch);
}
if review.sequence >= merge.sequence {
return Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalTimelineMismatch);
}
self.approval_evidence(review)?;
Ok(review)
}
fn approval_evidence(&self, review: &ReviewEvent) -> Result<(), MergeRequestEvidenceError> {
if self.thread.iter().any(|event| {
matches!(event, MergeRequestThreadEvent::ReviewRevoked(revoked)
if revoked.review_event_id == review.event_id)
}) {
return Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalRevoked);
}
if review.decision != ReviewDecision::Approve {
return Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalNotApproved);
}
let requested = self
.thread
.iter()
.find_map(|event| match event {
MergeRequestThreadEvent::ReviewRequested(requested)
if requested.event_id == review.request_event_id =>
{
Some(requested)
}
_ => None,
})
.ok_or(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ReviewRequestMissing)?;
if requested.subject_ref != review.subject_ref
|| requested.ticket_item_revision != review.ticket_item_revision
|| requested.ticket_merge_request_subjects != review.ticket_merge_request_subjects
|| requested.reviewer != review.reviewer
|| requested.sequence >= review.sequence
{
return Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ReviewRequestMismatch);
}
Ok(())
}
}
/// Finds an effective approval of the authoritative current Ticket revision and
/// exact linked source snapshot. Callers supply all linked requests and resolved
/// source refs (recorded merged refs for completion); this function does not read
/// authority, resolve selectors, require merged state, or mutate lifecycle state.
/// An explicit event id validates that approval only; `None` discovers any valid
/// attestation. Snapshot ordering is immaterial, but duplicate ids are rejected.
pub fn requirement_approval<'a>(
requests: &'a [MergeRequest],
item_revision: &str,
subjects: &[MergeRequestReviewSubject],
event_id: Option<&str>,
) -> Result<&'a ReviewEvent, MergeRequestEvidenceError> {
if requests.len() != subjects.len()
|| !same_source_snapshot(subjects, subjects)
|| requests.iter().any(|request| {
requests
.iter()
.filter(|other| other.merge_request_id == request.merge_request_id)
.count()
!= 1
|| !subjects
.iter()
.any(|subject| subject.merge_request_id == request.merge_request_id)
})
{
return Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::SourceSnapshotMismatch);
}
for request in requests {
for event in request.thread.iter().rev() {
let MergeRequestThreadEvent::Review(review) = event else {
continue;
};
if event_id.is_some_and(|id| id != review.event_id) {
continue;
}
let evidence = (|| {
request.approval_evidence(review)?;
if !request
.effective_review(&review.subject_ref)
.is_some_and(|effective| effective.event_id == review.event_id)
{
return Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalNotEffective);
}
if review.ticket_item_revision != item_revision || item_revision.trim().is_empty() {
return Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ItemRevisionMismatch);
}
if !same_source_snapshot(&review.ticket_merge_request_subjects, subjects) {
return Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::SourceSnapshotMismatch);
}
if !subjects.iter().any(|subject| {
subject.merge_request_id == request.merge_request_id
&& subject.subject_ref == review.subject_ref
}) {
return Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalSourceMismatch);
}
Ok(review)
})();
if evidence.is_ok() || event_id.is_some() {
return evidence;
}
}
}
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::RequirementApprovalMissing)
}
fn same_source_snapshot(
left: &[MergeRequestReviewSubject],
right: &[MergeRequestReviewSubject],
) -> bool {
!left.is_empty()
&& left.len() == right.len()
&& left.iter().all(|subject| {
!subject.merge_request_id.trim().is_empty()
&& !subject.subject_ref.trim().is_empty()
&& left
.iter()
.filter(|other| other.merge_request_id == subject.merge_request_id)
.count()
== 1
&& right.iter().filter(|other| *other == subject).count() == 1
})
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Default)]
@@ -1201,81 +1435,30 @@ impl MergeRequestStore {
for merge_request_id in &actual_ids {
let request = load_mr(&transaction, &input.auth.workspace_id, merge_request_id)?
.ok_or(MergeRequestError::NotFound)?;
if request.state != MergeRequestState::Merged {
return Err(MergeRequestError::NotReady(format!(
"Merge Request `{merge_request_id}` has no merged result"
)));
}
request.integration_approval().map_err(|error| {
let message = format!("Merge Request `{merge_request_id}`: {}", error.as_str());
if error == MergeRequestEvidenceError::MergeResultMissing {
MergeRequestError::Corrupt(message)
} else {
MergeRequestError::NotReady(message)
}
})?;
let merge = request
.thread
.iter()
.rev()
.find_map(|event| match event {
MergeRequestThreadEvent::Merge(event) => Some(event),
_ => None,
})
.ok_or_else(|| {
MergeRequestError::Corrupt(format!(
"merged Merge Request `{merge_request_id}` has no MergeResult"
))
})?;
let review = request
.thread
.iter()
.find_map(|event| match event {
MergeRequestThreadEvent::Review(review)
if review.event_id == merge.approval_event_id
&& review.subject_ref == merge.approved_source_ref =>
{
Some(review)
}
_ => None,
})
.filter(|review| {
!request.thread.iter().any(|event| {
matches!(
event,
MergeRequestThreadEvent::ReviewRevoked(revoked)
if revoked.review_event_id == review.event_id
)
})
})
.ok_or_else(|| {
MergeRequestError::NotReady(format!(
"Merge Request `{merge_request_id}` integration approval is missing or revoked"
))
})?;
if review.decision != ReviewDecision::Approve {
return Err(MergeRequestError::NotReady(format!(
"Merge Request `{merge_request_id}` lacks an approved integration result"
)));
}
.merged_result()
.map_err(|error| MergeRequestError::Corrupt(error.as_str().into()))?;
merged_subjects.push(MergeRequestReviewSubject {
merge_request_id: merge_request_id.clone(),
subject_ref: merge.approved_source_ref.clone(),
});
requests.push(request);
}
let has_requirement_attestation = requests.iter().any(|request| {
request.thread.iter().rev().any(|event| {
let MergeRequestThreadEvent::Review(review) = event else {
return false;
};
review.event_id == input.requirement_approval_event_id
&& review.decision == ReviewDecision::Approve
&& review.ticket_item_revision == input.item_revision
&& review.ticket_merge_request_subjects == merged_subjects
&& request
.effective_review(&review.subject_ref)
.is_some_and(|effective| effective.event_id == review.event_id)
})
});
if !has_requirement_attestation {
return Err(MergeRequestError::NotReady(
"no effective Reviewer approval attests the current Ticket revision and exact merged source set"
.into(),
));
}
requirement_approval(
&requests,
&input.item_revision,
&merged_subjects,
Some(&input.requirement_approval_event_id),
)
.map_err(|error| MergeRequestError::NotReady(error.as_str().into()))?;
let updated = transaction.execute(
"UPDATE typed_tickets
SET workflow_state='done',workflow_state_explicit=1,updated_at=?3
+459
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,459 @@
use chrono::{TimeZone, Utc};
use merge_request::*;
fn actor() -> WorkerIdentity {
WorkerIdentity {
runtime_id: "runtime".into(),
worker_id: "reviewer".into(),
}
}
fn subjects() -> Vec<MergeRequestReviewSubject> {
vec![
MergeRequestReviewSubject {
merge_request_id: "MR-1".into(),
subject_ref: "source-one".into(),
},
MergeRequestReviewSubject {
merge_request_id: "MR-2".into(),
subject_ref: "source-two".into(),
},
]
}
fn add_review(
request: &mut MergeRequest,
event_id: &str,
revision: &str,
snapshot: &[MergeRequestReviewSubject],
decision: ReviewDecision,
) {
let subject = snapshot
.iter()
.find(|subject| subject.merge_request_id == request.merge_request_id)
.unwrap();
let sequence = request.thread.len() as u64 + 1;
let requested = ReviewRequestedEvent {
event_id: format!("request-{event_id}"),
sequence,
subject_ref: subject.subject_ref.clone(),
ticket_item_revision: revision.into(),
ticket_merge_request_subjects: snapshot.to_vec(),
requested_by: actor(),
reviewer: actor(),
created_at: request.created_at,
};
let review = ReviewEvent {
event_id: event_id.into(),
sequence: sequence + 1,
request_event_id: requested.event_id.clone(),
subject_ref: requested.subject_ref.clone(),
ticket_item_revision: revision.into(),
ticket_merge_request_subjects: snapshot.to_vec(),
decision,
body: String::new(),
findings: vec![],
reviewer: actor(),
created_at: request.created_at,
};
request
.thread
.push(MergeRequestThreadEvent::ReviewRequested(requested));
request.thread.push(MergeRequestThreadEvent::Review(review));
}
fn merged_requests() -> Vec<MergeRequest> {
let now = Utc.with_ymd_and_hms(2026, 10, 8, 12, 0, 0).unwrap();
let snapshot = subjects();
snapshot
.iter()
.map(|subject| {
let mut request = MergeRequest {
workspace_id: "W".into(),
merge_request_id: subject.merge_request_id.clone(),
repository_id: subject.merge_request_id.clone(),
state: MergeRequestState::Merged,
selector_from: Some("work/source".into()),
selector_to: "main".into(),
ticket_ids: vec!["T".into()],
created_at: now,
updated_at: now,
thread: vec![],
};
let approval_id = format!("integration-{}", subject.merge_request_id);
add_review(
&mut request,
&approval_id,
"revision-one",
&snapshot,
ReviewDecision::Approve,
);
request
.thread
.push(MergeRequestThreadEvent::Merge(MergeEvent {
event_id: format!("merge-{}", subject.merge_request_id),
sequence: 3,
operation_id: format!("operation-{}", subject.merge_request_id),
approval_event_id: approval_id,
approved_source_ref: subject.subject_ref.clone(),
target_ref_before: "target-before".into(),
target_ref_after: "target-after".into(),
strategy: MergeStrategy::FastForward,
resolution: ConflictResolution::None,
merged_by: actor(),
created_at: now,
}));
request
})
.collect()
}
#[test]
fn postmerge_latest_approval_attests_the_current_revision_without_replacing_integration() {
let mut requests = merged_requests();
let snapshot = subjects();
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(
&requests,
"revision-two",
&snapshot,
Some("integration-MR-1")
),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ItemRevisionMismatch)
);
add_review(
&mut requests[0],
"postmerge",
"revision-two",
&snapshot,
ReviewDecision::Approve,
);
assert_eq!(
requests[0].integration_approval().unwrap().event_id,
"integration-MR-1"
);
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-two", &snapshot, None)
.unwrap()
.event_id,
"postmerge"
);
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-two", &snapshot, Some("postmerge"))
.unwrap()
.event_id,
"postmerge"
);
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(
&requests,
"revision-one",
&snapshot,
Some("integration-MR-1")
),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalNotEffective)
);
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-two", &snapshot, Some("unknown")),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::RequirementApprovalMissing)
);
}
#[test]
fn later_request_changes_prevents_older_requirement_approval_from_being_effective() {
let mut requests = merged_requests();
let snapshot = subjects();
add_review(
&mut requests[0],
"approved",
"revision-two",
&snapshot,
ReviewDecision::Approve,
);
add_review(
&mut requests[0],
"changes",
"revision-two",
&snapshot,
ReviewDecision::RequestChanges,
);
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-two", &snapshot, None),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::RequirementApprovalMissing)
);
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-two", &snapshot, Some("approved")),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalNotEffective)
);
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-two", &snapshot, Some("changes")),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalNotApproved)
);
assert!(requests[0].integration_approval().is_ok());
}
#[test]
fn changed_revision_or_any_linked_source_invalidates_a_multiple_mr_attestation() {
let requests = merged_requests();
let original = subjects();
assert!(requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-one", &original, None).is_ok());
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(
&requests,
"revision-two",
&original,
Some("integration-MR-1")
),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ItemRevisionMismatch)
);
let mut changed = original.clone();
changed[1].subject_ref = "changed-source-two".into();
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(
&requests,
"revision-one",
&changed,
Some("integration-MR-1")
),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::SourceSnapshotMismatch)
);
let mut reversed = original.clone();
reversed.reverse();
assert!(requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-one", &reversed, None).is_ok());
// Even after the caller refreshes the linked request collection, an old
// attestation cannot authorize completion against a smaller linked set.
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(
&requests[..1],
"revision-one",
&original[..1],
Some("integration-MR-1")
),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::SourceSnapshotMismatch)
);
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-one", &original[..1], None),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::SourceSnapshotMismatch)
);
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(
&requests,
"revision-one",
&[original[0].clone(), original[0].clone()],
None
),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::SourceSnapshotMismatch)
);
}
#[test]
fn refreshed_postmerge_approval_can_attest_a_changed_multiple_mr_set_and_revision() {
let mut requests = merged_requests();
let mut snapshot = subjects();
snapshot.pop();
requests.pop();
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-two", &snapshot, None),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::RequirementApprovalMissing)
);
add_review(
&mut requests[0],
"refreshed-set",
"revision-two",
&snapshot,
ReviewDecision::Approve,
);
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-two", &snapshot, None)
.unwrap()
.event_id,
"refreshed-set"
);
assert_eq!(
requests[0].integration_approval().unwrap().event_id,
"integration-MR-1"
);
}
#[test]
fn requirement_approval_must_bind_its_own_mr_source_and_corresponding_request() {
let original = subjects();
for (case, expected) in [
("missing", MergeRequestEvidenceError::ReviewRequestMissing),
("revision", MergeRequestEvidenceError::ReviewRequestMismatch),
("snapshot", MergeRequestEvidenceError::ReviewRequestMismatch),
("reviewer", MergeRequestEvidenceError::ReviewRequestMismatch),
("source", MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalSourceMismatch),
] {
let mut requests = merged_requests();
for event in &mut requests[0].thread {
match event {
MergeRequestThreadEvent::Review(review) if case == "missing" => {
review.request_event_id = "absent-request".into();
}
MergeRequestThreadEvent::ReviewRequested(requested) => match case {
"revision" => requested.ticket_item_revision = "other-revision".into(),
"snapshot" => {
requested.ticket_merge_request_subjects.pop();
}
"reviewer" => requested.reviewer.worker_id = "other-reviewer".into(),
"source" => requested.subject_ref = "unbound-source".into(),
_ => {}
},
MergeRequestThreadEvent::Review(review) if case == "source" => {
review.subject_ref = "unbound-source".into();
}
_ => {}
}
}
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(
&requests,
"revision-one",
&original,
Some("integration-MR-1")
),
Err(expected),
"{case}"
);
}
}
#[test]
fn revoked_requirement_approval_is_rejected_and_discovery_uses_another_valid_mr() {
let mut requests = merged_requests();
let created_at = requests[0].created_at;
requests[0]
.thread
.push(MergeRequestThreadEvent::ReviewRevoked(ReviewRevokedEvent {
event_id: "revocation".into(),
sequence: 4,
review_event_id: "integration-MR-1".into(),
subject_ref: "source-one".into(),
reason: String::new(),
revoked_by: actor(),
created_at,
}));
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(
&requests,
"revision-one",
&subjects(),
Some("integration-MR-1")
),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalRevoked)
);
assert_eq!(
requirement_approval(&requests, "revision-one", &subjects(), None)
.unwrap()
.event_id,
"integration-MR-2"
);
}
#[test]
fn integration_approval_must_strictly_predate_the_merge_sequence() {
for approval_sequence in [2, 3, 4] {
let mut requests = merged_requests();
for event in &mut requests[0].thread {
if let MergeRequestThreadEvent::Review(review) = event {
review.sequence = approval_sequence;
}
}
let result = requests[0].integration_approval();
if approval_sequence < 3 {
assert!(result.is_ok());
} else {
assert_eq!(
result,
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalTimelineMismatch),
"approval sequence {approval_sequence}"
);
}
}
}
#[test]
fn blank_saved_source_is_not_valid_integration_evidence_even_when_the_review_matches() {
for source in ["", " \t\n"] {
let mut requests = merged_requests();
for event in &mut requests[0].thread {
match event {
MergeRequestThreadEvent::ReviewRequested(requested) => {
requested.subject_ref = source.into();
}
MergeRequestThreadEvent::Review(review) => {
review.subject_ref = source.into();
}
MergeRequestThreadEvent::Merge(merge) => {
merge.approved_source_ref = source.into();
}
_ => {}
}
}
assert_eq!(
requests[0].integration_approval(),
Err(MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalSourceMismatch)
);
}
}
#[test]
fn evidence_error_codes_are_stable_machine_diagnostics_separate_from_messages() {
for (error, code) in [
(MergeRequestEvidenceError::NotMerged, "not_merged"),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::MergeResultMissing,
"merge_result_missing",
),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalMissing,
"approval_missing",
),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalRevoked,
"approval_revoked",
),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalNotApproved,
"approval_not_approved",
),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalSourceMismatch,
"approval_source_mismatch",
),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalTimelineMismatch,
"approval_timeline_mismatch",
),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ReviewRequestMissing,
"review_request_missing",
),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ReviewRequestMismatch,
"review_request_mismatch",
),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalNotEffective,
"approval_not_effective",
),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ItemRevisionMismatch,
"item_revision_mismatch",
),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::SourceSnapshotMismatch,
"source_snapshot_mismatch",
),
(
MergeRequestEvidenceError::RequirementApprovalMissing,
"requirement_approval_missing",
),
] {
assert_eq!(error.code(), code);
assert_ne!(error.code(), error.as_str());
}
}
+140
View File
@@ -1098,3 +1098,143 @@ fn partial_integration_retains_ticket_and_assignment_until_guarded_ticket_comple
.unwrap();
assert_eq!(replay, completed);
}
#[test]
fn persisted_merged_result_requires_matching_nonrevoked_requested_approval_before_completion() {
for (case, expected) in [
(
"merge-missing",
MergeRequestEvidenceError::MergeResultMissing,
),
(
"approval-missing",
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalMissing,
),
("revoked", MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalRevoked),
(
"source-mismatch",
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalSourceMismatch,
),
(
"not-approved",
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalNotApproved,
),
(
"request-missing",
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ReviewRequestMissing,
),
(
"request-mismatch",
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ReviewRequestMismatch,
),
(
"approval-after-merge",
MergeRequestEvidenceError::ApprovalTimelineMismatch,
),
] {
let (dir, store) = fixture();
open(&store);
let review = approve(&store, "merged-source", "integration-token");
let merge = store
.complete(CompleteMergeRequest {
merge_request_id: "MR".into(),
ticket_id: "T".into(),
operation_id: "merge".into(),
approval_event_id: review.event_id.clone(),
current_subject_ref: "merged-source".into(),
target_ref_before: "before".into(),
target_ref_after: "after".into(),
strategy: MergeStrategy::FastForward,
resolution: ConflictResolution::None,
auth: auth(),
now: at(5),
})
.unwrap();
let persisted = store.get_by_id("W", "MR").unwrap();
assert_eq!(persisted.merged_result().unwrap(), &merge);
assert_eq!(persisted.integration_approval().unwrap(), &review);
let connection = Connection::open(dir.path().join("db")).unwrap();
match case {
"merge-missing" | "approval-missing" | "request-missing" => {
let kind = match case {
"merge-missing" => "merge",
"approval-missing" => "review",
_ => "review_requested",
};
connection.execute(
"DELETE FROM merge_request_thread_events WHERE workspace_id='W' AND merge_request_id='MR' AND kind=?1",
[kind],
).unwrap();
}
"revoked" => {
store
.revoke_review(RevokeMergeRequestReview {
merge_request_id: "MR".into(),
ticket_id: "T".into(),
review_event_id: review.event_id.clone(),
reason: "invalid integration evidence".into(),
auth: auth(),
now: at(6),
})
.unwrap();
}
"approval-after-merge" => {
let mut altered = review.clone();
altered.sequence = merge.sequence + 1;
connection.execute(
"UPDATE merge_request_thread_events SET payload_json=?1,sequence=?2 WHERE workspace_id='W' AND merge_request_id='MR' AND kind='review'",
rusqlite::params![serde_json::to_string(&altered).unwrap(), altered.sequence],
).unwrap();
}
_ => {
let mut altered = review.clone();
match case {
"source-mismatch" => altered.subject_ref = "different-source".into(),
"not-approved" => altered.decision = ReviewDecision::RequestChanges,
"request-mismatch" => {
altered.ticket_item_revision = "different-revision".into()
}
_ => unreachable!(),
}
connection.execute(
"UPDATE merge_request_thread_events SET payload_json=?1 WHERE workspace_id='W' AND merge_request_id='MR' AND kind='review'",
[serde_json::to_string(&altered).unwrap()],
).unwrap();
}
}
let reloaded = store.get_by_id("W", "MR").unwrap();
assert_eq!(reloaded.integration_approval(), Err(expected), "{case}");
let rejected = store
.complete_ticket(CompleteTicket {
ticket_id: "T".into(),
operation_id: "complete-ticket".into(),
item_revision: "t".into(),
merge_request_ids: vec!["MR".into()],
requirement_approval_event_id: review.event_id.clone(),
auth: auth(),
now: at(7),
})
.unwrap_err();
match rejected {
MergeRequestError::Corrupt(message)
if expected == MergeRequestEvidenceError::MergeResultMissing =>
{
assert!(message.contains(expected.as_str()), "{case}: {message}");
}
MergeRequestError::NotReady(message)
if expected != MergeRequestEvidenceError::MergeResultMissing =>
{
assert!(message.contains(expected.as_str()), "{case}: {message}");
}
other => panic!("{case}: unexpected completion error {other}"),
}
let (state, assigned): (String, bool) = connection.query_row(
"SELECT workflow_state, EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM ticket_current_worker_assignments WHERE workspace_id='W' AND ticket_id='T') FROM typed_tickets WHERE workspace_id='W' AND ticket_id='T'",
[],
|row| Ok((row.get(0)?, row.get(1)?)),
).unwrap();
assert_eq!(state, "inprogress", "{case}");
assert!(assigned, "{case}");
}
}