Hare/yoi
1
1
Fork 0
Code Actions Packages Releases Activity
develop
yoi/.yoi/tickets/00001KTK1FPYG/thread.md

18 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Created

Created by LocalTicketBackend create.

Plan

Intake refinement: implementation_ready

Context checked:

  • Target Ticket body/thread.
  • replace-intake-state-with-planning resolution: planning-state model is settled and ready|queued -> planning now requires audited typed state-change reasons.
  • allow-spawnpod-child-workspace-cwd resolution: confirms the motivating authority-adjacent example was risky but sufficiently specified and should be treated as reviewer focus when binding decisions exist.
  • Current .yoi/workflow/ticket-orchestrator-routing.md: already contains the routing surface to refine, including return_to_planning, implementation_ready, Evidence checked, and IntentPacket sections.

Binding decisions / invariants:

  • Returning a ready/queued Ticket to planning must require a concrete missing decision/information item after bounded relevant context checking.
  • Risk flags and risky domains are context lookup triggers and reviewer-focus signals, not stop gates.
  • If no concrete gap can be named after context checking, risky-but-specified Tickets should route as implementation_ready when other criteria are satisfied.
  • The routing decision record must expose checked evidence and explain why any gap cannot be safely handled as implementation latitude.
  • Do not reintroduce a separate readiness/preflight lane or operation.

Implementation latitude:

  • Implementation may choose whether to refine only .yoi/workflow/ticket-orchestrator-routing.md, related prompt resources, focused tests, or all of those if the current code layout requires it.
  • Wording and test structure may be chosen locally as long as the policy is explicit and reviewer can verify the acceptance criteria.

Escalation conditions:

  • Escalate if implementation would change the workflow-state graph or Ticket lifecycle semantics beyond the documented planning -> ready -> queued -> inprogress -> done model.
  • Escalate if enforcing evidence recording requires new public API/tool schema changes rather than workflow/prompt/test updates.
  • Escalate if the existing prompt/workflow guidance is already fully compliant and no meaningful code/resource change is needed; record a close-ready/no-op dossier instead of manufacturing churn.

Validation:

  • target/debug/yoi ticket doctor
  • git diff --check
  • Focused prompt/workflow validation or tests covering: risky but specified Ticket -> implementation-ready; genuinely missing decision -> return to planning; risk flag alone is insufficient as the reason.
  • nix build .#yoi if runtime resources, prompts, code, or packaging inputs change.

Intake summary

既存 Ticket を重複作成せず refinement した。replace-intake-state-with-planning の完了により前提は満たされており、対象 Ticket は Orchestrator routing guidance の bounded context check policy として implementation_ready。binding invariants、implementation latitude、escalation conditions、validation を thread に補足済み。未決定の blocking question はない。risk flags は workflow/prompt、orchestrator-routing、planning-state、authority-boundary/context-check。

State changed

Intake refinement completed. Ticket has enough intent, acceptance criteria, binding invariants, implementation latitude, escalation conditions, and validation guidance for Orchestrator routing.

State changed

Ticket を workspace-panel が queued にしました。

State changed

Accepted queued implementation after reading the Ticket, current Orchestrator routing workflow guidance, workspace state, visible Pod/worktree state, and the recently merged orchestration-plan/tool changes. No active implementation worktree is present; the requested change is bounded to routing prompt/workflow guidance and tests/resources.

Decision

Routing decision: implementation_ready

Evidence checked:

  • Ticket body and acceptance criteria for orchestrator-return-to-planning-context-policy.
  • Current .yoi/workflow/ticket-orchestrator-routing.md, including existing return_to_planning, implementation_ready, and queued acceptance sections.
  • Current workspace/worktree state after merging and cleaning up the previous TUI/composer work.
  • Visible Pod state: no active sibling coder/reviewer for earlier work remains.
  • Recent merged context: replace-intake-state-with-planning, ticket-orchestration-plan-tool, and queued-routing behavior already require explicit queued acceptance and durable evidence.
  • TicketOrchestrationPlanQuery is documented in the workflow, but this current orchestrator session's tool list does not expose the newly merged tool, so there was no callable plan-query surface to inspect for this Ticket.

Reason:

  • The Ticket has concrete requirements and acceptance criteria.
  • The change is policy/prompt/workflow guidance, not a broad runtime redesign.
  • Current workflow text already contains some related clauses, so implementation should be a bounded tightening: make the evidence/context requirement explicit, ensure risky-but-specified Tickets can proceed, and add/adjust focused validation.

IntentPacket:

Intent:

  • Strengthen Orchestrator routing guidance so returning ready/queued Tickets to planning requires concrete missing information/decision evidence after bounded project-context checks, not just Ticket text or risk flags.

Binding decisions / invariants:

  • Do not reintroduce a separate readiness/preflight state or lane.
  • Do not change Ticket workflow states or transition semantics.
  • Do not make every queued Ticket require broad repository archaeology.
  • Risk flags and risky domains are context lookup and reviewer-focus signals, not automatic stop gates.
  • If returning to planning, the routing record must include the concrete missing decision/information, context checked, why implementation latitude is insufficient, and the next planning question/action.
  • If no concrete missing item remains after bounded context checks, a risky-but-specified Ticket should proceed as implementation_ready with IntentPacket invariants, escalation conditions, and reviewer focus.
  • Keep the change in maintained routing workflow/prompt/resource docs and focused validation; avoid runtime scheduler/orchestration refactors.

Implementation latitude:

  • Coder may update .yoi/workflow/ticket-orchestrator-routing.md, resource prompts/workflows, and tests that validate workflow/prompt guidance.
  • If there is no existing prompt-resource test harness, coder may add a narrow text validation test in the most appropriate existing crate, or document why focused grep/resource validation is the right evidence.
  • Include or reference an example equivalent to allow-spawnpod-child-workspace-cwd: authority-adjacent but specified work should proceed with reviewer focus rather than return to planning solely because it touches authority/scope/Pod concerns.

Escalate if:

  • Implementation requires changing Ticket backend workflow_state semantics.
  • Existing tests/resources imply a conflicting policy that must be resolved by human decision.
  • A broad prompt/workflow templating redesign would be needed instead of a narrow guidance update.

Validation:

  • Focused workflow/prompt validation or tests covering: risky but specified Ticket -> implementation-ready; genuinely missing decision -> return to planning; risk flag alone is insufficient.
  • git diff --check.
  • cargo run -q -p yoi -- ticket doctor.
  • cargo check --workspace if code/tests are touched.
  • nix build .#yoi if resources/tests/package inputs are touched.

Implementation report

Implementation routing started.

Worktree/branch:

  • Worktree: .worktree/orchestrator-return-to-planning-context-policy
  • Branch: orchestrator-return-to-planning-context-policy
  • Base/routing commit: 9f35442 ticket: route return-to-planning policy

Spawned sibling Coder Pod:

  • coder-orchestrator-return-to-planning-context-policy
  • Scope: non-recursive read on parent workspace root plus recursive write limited to the child worktree.

Routing context:

  • The previous composer-history implementation was merged, validated, closed, and cleaned up before this new queued Ticket was accepted.
  • This Ticket is now the active routed implementation work.

Implementation report

Coder implementation completed and is ready for sibling review.

Coder Pod:

  • coder-orchestrator-return-to-planning-context-policy
  • Commit: 8576615 workflow: tighten orchestrator planning return policy
  • Worktree status before review: clean branch orchestrator-return-to-planning-context-policy
  • Stopped after collecting output to reclaim delegated worktree scope.

Implementation summary:

  • Tightened Orchestrator routing workflow so returning ready / queued Tickets to planning requires concrete missing decision/information evidence after bounded project-context checks.
  • Clarified risk flags / risky domains / authority-adjacent work as context lookup, IntentPacket invariant, reviewer-focus, and escalation signals rather than automatic stop gates.
  • Added risky-but-specified guidance and an allow-spawnpod-child-workspace-cwd-style example for proceeding with reviewer focus when work is specified.
  • Updated related planning/preflight and multi-agent workflow wording plus work-item docs.

Changed files:

  • .yoi/workflow/ticket-orchestrator-routing.md
  • .yoi/workflow/ticket-preflight-workflow.md
  • .yoi/workflow/multi-agent-workflow.md
  • docs/development/work-items.md

Coder validation reported passed:

  • Focused workflow/prompt text validation for risky-but-specified -> implementation_ready, genuinely missing decision -> return_to_planning, and risk flag alone insufficient.
  • git diff --check
  • cargo run -q -p yoi -- ticket doctor
  • nix build .#yoi

Coder did not run cargo check --workspace because only docs/workflow resources changed.

Review: approve

Review result: approve

Scope reviewed:

  • Commit 8576615 (workflow: tighten orchestrator planning return policy).
  • Changed files: .yoi/workflow/ticket-orchestrator-routing.md, .yoi/workflow/ticket-preflight-workflow.md, .yoi/workflow/multi-agent-workflow.md, docs/development/work-items.md.
  • Ticket body/thread and orchestration plan records for this Ticket (TicketOrchestrationPlanQuery: 0 records).
  • Targeted stale-guidance search across .yoi/workflow, docs, and resources/prompts for preflight/planning/risk/return-to-planning terminology.

Findings:

  • No separate readiness/preflight state or lane is reintroduced. ticket-orchestrator-routing.md keeps workflow_state as planning -> ready -> queued -> inprogress -> done and describes ticket-preflight-workflow only as a legacy planning/requirements-sync slug; ticket-preflight-workflow.md explicitly says not to treat preflight as a state/lane/current metadata vocabulary.
  • Ticket workflow-state and queued acceptance semantics remain unchanged. The updated guidance still requires queued -> inprogress before worktree/spawn/implementation side effects and does not add a new transition.
  • Returning ready/queued Tickets to planning now requires concrete missing decision/information plus checked context, why implementation latitude is insufficient, and next planning question/action.
  • Risk flags/risky domains are consistently documented as bounded context lookup, IntentPacket/reviewer focus, and escalation signals rather than automatic stop gates.
  • The guidance stays bounded: it names targeted context sources and explicitly says the purpose is not broad repository archaeology.
  • Risky-but-specified work is allowed to proceed as implementation_ready; the routing examples include the required allow-spawnpod-child-workspace-cwd-equivalent authority/scope/Pod example with reviewer focus rather than planning return solely for risk category.
  • Maintained workflow/docs are aligned. I did not find conflicting authority-adjacent automatic-stop wording in .yoi/workflow, docs, or resources/prompts searches.

Validation run in the worktree:

  • Focused text validation via grep assertions for risky-but-specified -> implementation_ready, concrete missing item requirements, risk-alone insufficiency, bounded context/non-archaeology wording, preflight compatibility wording, multi-agent proceed-with-reviewer-focus wording, and work-items docs alignment.
  • git diff --check 8576615^ 8576615 passed.
  • cargo run -q -p yoi -- ticket doctor passed (doctor: ok).
  • nix build .#yoi passed.
  • Worktree remained clean after review.

I did not run cargo check --workspace; the diff is workflow/docs text only, and nix build .#yoi plus Ticket doctor covered packaging/runtime-resource integrity for this change.

Implementation report

Merge-ready dossier for human/orchestrator approval.

Status:

  • Implementation branch: orchestrator-return-to-planning-context-policy
  • Worktree: .worktree/orchestrator-return-to-planning-context-policy
  • Commit under review: 8576615 workflow: tighten orchestrator planning return policy
  • Reviewer: reviewer-orchestrator-return-to-planning-context-policy
  • Review result: approved; no blocking findings.

Intent / invariant check:

  • Strengthens Orchestrator routing guidance so ready / queued Tickets are returned to planning only when a concrete missing decision/information remains after bounded project-context checks.
  • Keeps workflow_state semantics unchanged: planning -> ready -> queued -> inprogress -> done.
  • Does not reintroduce preflight/readiness as a separate state/lane.
  • Keeps risk flags and authority-adjacent domains as context lookup / reviewer-focus / escalation signals, not automatic stop gates.
  • Allows risky-but-specified Tickets to proceed as implementation_ready with IntentPacket invariants, escalation conditions, and reviewer focus.

Implementation summary:

  • Updated ticket-orchestrator-routing to require concrete missing-item evidence, checked context, implementation-latitude insufficiency, and next planning action before planning return.
  • Added an allow-spawnpod-child-workspace-cwd-style authority/scope/Pod example showing specified risky work proceeding with reviewer focus.
  • Aligned ticket-preflight-workflow, multi-agent-workflow, and work-item docs with the same policy.

Validation evidence:

  • Coder reported pass:
    • focused workflow/prompt text validation for risky-but-specified -> implementation_ready, genuinely missing decision -> return_to_planning, and risk flag alone insufficient
    • git diff --check
    • cargo run -q -p yoi -- ticket doctor
    • nix build .#yoi
  • Reviewer independently passed:
    • focused grep/text validation across .yoi/workflow, docs, and resources/prompts
    • git diff --check 8576615^ 8576615
    • cargo run -q -p yoi -- ticket doctor
    • nix build .#yoi

Residual risks / notes:

  • cargo check --workspace was intentionally not run by coder/reviewer because the implementation is workflow/docs text only; nix build .#yoi and Ticket doctor were used for packaging/resource integrity.
  • Final merge/close/cleanup is intentionally not performed here without explicit merge approval.

State changed

Ticket closed; workflow_state を done に設定しました。

完了

Implemented, reviewed, merged, and validated.

Summary:

  • Strengthened Orchestrator routing guidance so ready / queued Tickets are returned to planning only when a concrete missing decision/information remains after bounded project-context checks.
  • Clarified risk flags, risky domains, and authority-adjacent work as context lookup / reviewer-focus / escalation signals rather than automatic stop gates.
  • Added risky-but-specified guidance and an allow-spawnpod-child-workspace-cwd-style example for proceeding with reviewer focus when work is specified.
  • Aligned ticket-preflight-workflow, multi-agent-workflow, and work-item docs with the same policy.
  • Preserved workflow_state semantics and did not reintroduce preflight/readiness as a separate state or lane.

Implementation:

  • Coder commit: 8576615 workflow: tighten orchestrator planning return policy
  • Reviewer approved with no blocking findings.
  • Merge commit: 5af58b5 merge: tighten orchestrator planning return policy

Validation after merge:

  • cargo fmt --check
  • git diff --check
  • cargo run -q -p yoi -- ticket doctor
  • nix build .#yoi

cargo check --workspace was intentionally omitted because the merged implementation is workflow/docs text only and no Rust code/tests changed; Nix build covered resource/package integrity.