4.3 KiB
Created
Created by LocalTicketBackend create.
Plan
Plan: design the workspace orchestration panel before implementation.
The panel is not a :ticket command extension. It is a workspace-scoped orchestration surface with:
- Companion foreground management chat;
- Ticket Intake composer target that sends user input directly to Intake, not Companion history;
- background workspace Orchestrator restored/spawned as
<dir-name>-orchestrator; - Intake -> Orchestrator handoff;
- an action model prioritizing human-required Ticket/Intake decisions over raw Pod idle state.
Implementation is split into child tickets:
workspace-orchestration-panel-designworkspace-panel-orchestrator-lifecycleworkspace-panel-composer-targetsticket-intake-orchestrator-handoffworkspace-panel-action-model
Existing :ticket ... commands remain as low-level fallback, not the main UX.
Decision
Decision/update from UI discussion:
Do not preserve --multi as a separate long-term UI surface. The workspace panel should become the unified workspace view.
--multi-style Pod list behavior remains useful, but should be treated as the panel's no-Ticket / Pod-centric route rather than a distinct architecture. In workspaces where Ticket config/storage is unavailable or Ticket usage is not desired, opening the panel should still provide the current multi-Pod discovery/attach/send affordances as a fallback view.
Implications:
- Implementation can reuse current
--multicode/components as the first panel substrate. - The long-term command/launch model should prefer a panel view option; any existing
--multientry point can remain as a compatibility alias or shortcut into the Pod-centric panel route during migration. - The panel model should tolerate an empty/unavailable Ticket backend and still show useful Pod rows/actions.
- Avoid designing two separate surfaces with duplicated selection, attach, send, and rendering logic.
Decision
Decision/update from launch-route discussion:
Current route is still yoi --multi -> LaunchMode::Multi -> single_pod::run_multi(...) -> current multi-Pod dashboard. There is no dedicated yoi panel command yet.
Target route should be yoi panel: open the workspace panel for the current working directory/workspace. The panel should resolve the workspace from cwd using the same project/config/Ticket root conventions as the rest of Yoi, then:
- show Ticket/action-centric mode when
.yoi/tickets/ Ticket config is available or Ticket use is active; - fall back to the Pod-centric route (current
--multibehavior) when the workspace has no Ticket backend/config or no Ticket records; - keep current
--multias a temporary compatibility alias/shortcut intoyoi panel's Pod-centric route during migration, rather than a separate long-term surface.
This keeps a single workspace control surface while preserving the existing multi-Pod affordances for non-Ticket workspaces.
Decision
Decision/update from launch and no-Ticket workspace discussion:
Remove --multi as a user-facing launch option rather than keeping it as a compatibility alias.
Target launch model:
yoi panelopens the workspace panel for the current working directory/workspace.- The panel resolves Ticket config from the workspace.
- If
.yoi/ticket.config.toml/ Ticket config is defined and usable, the panel shows Ticket/action-centric workspace UI. - If Ticket config is undefined, the panel suppresses Ticket-related UI entirely:
- no Ticket/action rows;
- no Ticket-specific Pod labels/actions;
- no Intake/Orchestrator/Ticket workflow affordances;
- no Ticket-related diagnostics unless needed to explain an explicitly requested Ticket action.
- In that no-Ticket mode,
yoi panelshould provide the same functional surface as the current--multiview: Pod discovery/status, selection, attach/open, and direct send where currently supported.
This keeps one panel implementation while avoiding a permanent --multi surface or confusing Ticket UI in workspaces that have not opted into Ticket config.