4.1 KiB
4.1 KiB
| title | state | created_at | updated_at |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP local stdio integration architecture | active | 2026-06-10T07:48:45Z | 2026-06-13T15:30:22Z |
Objective
Add MCP local stdio integration to Yoi without weakening Worker history, prompt-context, scoped tool permission, or Plugin/Feature layering invariants.
MCP should be implemented as a protocol-backed integration layer on top of pod::feature. pod::feature supplies the contribution/lifecycle API substrate; MCP owns its own enablement, local server trust model, command/env/secret policy, and MCP-specific permissions. MCP is not the Plugin model, and Plugin permission policy is not implemented by feature-layer authority grants.
Strategic direction
- Baseline the implementation on MCP specification
2025-11-25. - Start with local stdio MCP servers only.
- Treat MCP server metadata, tools, resources, prompts, and results as untrusted content.
- Do not allow MCP resources/prompts to be hidden context injection.
- They must be explicit tool operations with history records.
- Use the normal Yoi tool registry, PreToolCall permission, history, and bounded result paths.
- Do not add private MCP-only bypasses around Worker/tool invariants.
- Keep sampling and elicitation fail-closed initially.
- Keep Streamable HTTP, remote auth, OAuth, and MCP Registry/distribution out of the first slice.
- Treat local stdio server execution as an explicit MCP config/trust decision, not as a
pod::featureauthority grant. - Document clearly that a configured local MCP server runs as a local executable; Yoi feature authority does not sandbox its OS-level side effects.
Layering decisions
pod::featureis an API/contribution substrate.- It owns contribution declarations, provider/service lifecycle hooks, diagnostics, dynamic registration plumbing, and integration with normal Worker/ToolRegistry paths.
- It does not own Plugin permission policy or MCP server trust policy.
- Plugin is a user-facing package/config/runtime layer over
pod::feature.- Plugin permissions are Plugin-layer policy.
- Plugin package discovery/enablement must not be conflated with MCP local server execution.
- MCP is a separate feature-backed integration layer.
- MCP enablement, command/env/secret handling, server trust, and MCP-specific permission decisions live in MCP config/implementation.
- MCP dynamic tools/resources/prompts are exposed through the feature API and ordinary Yoi tool paths.
Work breakdown
00001KTR81P9X— Extendpod::featureAPI for protocol-backed external providers.- provider/service lifecycle
- startup discovery and dynamic contribution registration
- bounded refresh semantics
- metadata/result normalization
- no feature-layer authority model for MCP/Plugin permissions
00001KTR82RB7— Implement MCP2025-11-25local stdio server bridge.- explicit MCP config and trust model
- initialize/capability negotiation
- tools/resources/prompts list/call/read/get
- bounded result serialization
- list-changed diagnostics/refresh behavior
00001KV0SP0TY— Remove feature-layer HostAuthority model.- remove authority/grant terminology from
pod::feature - keep real permission/trust policy in owning Plugin/MCP/manifest/tool layers
- remove authority/grant terminology from
- Later follow-ups, if needed.
- richer MCP tasks / task-support integration
- remote/HTTP transports
- OAuth / registry / package distribution
- Plugin package/runtime alignment, if an explicit MCP/plugin bridge is later approved
Success criteria
- A local mock MCP server can be configured explicitly and initialized.
- Discovered MCP tools appear as ordinary Yoi tools with stable namespacing.
- Tool calls go through ordinary permission and history paths.
- MCP resources/prompts are explicit operations, not hidden context injections.
- MCP result forms are bounded and safely serialized.
- Secret values, command/env details, and server diagnostics are redacted where required.
- Local server trust boundary is documented: Yoi does not sandbox the configured executable through feature authority.
- Feature, Plugin, and MCP permission/trust responsibilities are documented as separate layers.