yoi/.yoi/objectives/00001KVG0HR9M/item.md

6.1 KiB

title state created_at updated_at linked_tickets
Plugin platform roadmap active 2026-06-19T13:18:58Z 2026-06-19T13:18:58Z
00001KV5R5V2S
00001KV5W3PHA
00001KV5W3PHW
00001KV5W3PJ3
00001KVFD3YSV
00001KVFDX9AF
00001KVFDX9AY
00001KVG0HR96

Goal

Build Yoi's Plugin platform as a coherent extension system: packages are discovered and inspected safely, enabled explicitly, registered through typed Plugin surfaces, executed in a sandboxed runtime, constrained by Plugin-layer grants, and authored through SDK/templates rather than raw runtime ABI details.

The long-term platform goal is not merely to run Wasm. It is to make Plugin packages a durable, inspectable, permissioned, and authorable extension layer for Tools first, then host APIs (https, fs), and later Service / Ingress surfaces when concrete needs justify them.

Motivation / background

The current Plugin foundation is already substantial:

  • package discovery and explicit enablement resolver;
  • Tool surface registration through the ordinary ToolRegistry/model-visible schema path;
  • minimal sandboxed WASM Tool execution;
  • Plugin permission grant enforcement;
  • follow-up Tickets for read-only inspection CLI, https, fs, and Component Model migration.

The remaining work must be kept as one roadmap because the pieces constrain each other:

  • Plugin authoring needs an SDK/PDK and examples, not raw pointer/length Wasm ABI hand-coding.
  • https and fs host APIs must be grant-gated and shaped so they can move cleanly to typed Component Model interfaces.
  • Diagnostics (yoi plugin list/show) are needed before the system becomes harder to debug.
  • Component Model adoption should guide new host API design before a custom raw ABI becomes entrenched.
  • Service / Ingress are useful for bridge-style integrations, but should come after Tool runtime, diagnostics, and host API policy are stable.

Research of common Wasm extension systems points to the same pattern: mature systems combine a package manifest, explicit capabilities, a sandbox runtime, host-provided capability APIs, language SDK/PDK bindings, templates/examples, inspection/check tooling, and versioned interfaces.

Strategy / design direction

  • Keep Plugin as a user-facing package/config/runtime layer above lower-level pod::feature substrate.
    • pod::feature provides contribution/registration substrate.
    • Plugin owns package discovery, enablement, grant policy, runtime selection, authoring UX, and user-facing diagnostics.
  • Preserve authority boundaries.
    • Package discovery is read-only inventory.
    • Package presence never registers a Tool/Hook, executes Wasm, starts a Service, reads files, opens network, or injects context.
    • Explicit enablement and Plugin grants are required before registration/execution/host API use.
    • Tool calls/results continue through ordinary ToolRegistry and Worker history paths.
  • Treat Component Model as the preferred future Plugin runtime shape.
    • New typed Plugin host APIs should be designed in WIT-compatible terms.
    • runtime.kind = "wasm-component" should become the preferred runtime once implemented.
    • Current yoi-plugin-wasm-1 raw core-Wasm ABI remains a compatibility / migration bridge until Component Model execution and authoring are validated.
  • Sequence the platform in usable layers:
    1. Package discovery / explicit enablement / digest-pinned restore. Completed foundation.
    2. Tool surface registration. Completed foundation.
    3. Minimal WASM Tool execution. Completed foundation.
    4. Permission grants. Completed foundation.
    5. Read-only Plugin CLI inspection (yoi plugin list/show) for debugging discovery/enablement/grants/runtime metadata.
    6. https and fs host APIs for Tool Plugins, grant-gated and WIT-compatible.
    7. Component Model runtime migration and authoring model.
    8. Guest SDK/PDK, examples, check/pack/new authoring tooling.
    9. Service / Ingress / WebSocket or inbound HTTP only after Tool + host API foundations are stable.
  • Keep Discord-style bridge goals split into two stages.
    • Outbound Discord/webhook Tool is possible after https.
    • Bidirectional Discord bridge requires Service + Ingress + WebSocket or inbound HTTP and host routing policy.

Success criteria / exit conditions

  • Users can inspect Plugin discovery/enablement/grant/runtime state through a read-only CLI without executing Plugin code.
  • Plugin authors can build a Tool Plugin without writing raw memory/pointer ABI plumbing.
  • Tool Plugins can safely call grant-gated https and fs host APIs.
  • Component Model support is available or a documented migration path is active, with WIT-compatible host API types and measured packaging/runtime impact.
  • Plugin grants remain authoritative over registration, execution, and host API calls.
  • Plugin diagnostics explain missing package, invalid manifest, digest/version mismatch, missing grant, rejected schema, runtime mismatch, and unsupported host API cases safely.
  • Existing raw core-Wasm Plugin tests either remain passing or have an explicit compatibility/deprecation decision.
  • Documentation covers package format, runtime kinds, Component Model direction, host API authority, authoring SDK/templates, and operational debugging.
  • Service/Ingress work starts only after Tool Plugin + host API + diagnostics foundations are usable.

Decision context

  • This Objective is roadmap context, not Ticket authority. Implementation still requires reading concrete Ticket bodies, threads, artifacts, and relations.
  • Component Model direction supersedes making Yoi's custom raw ABI the long-term authoring interface, but does not require an immediate flag-day rewrite.
  • https / fs work should avoid choices that conflict with later WIT typed interfaces.
  • Guest SDK work should either target Component Model directly or keep the raw ABI wrapper clearly transitional.
  • Plugin and MCP remain separate. Component Model adoption for Plugin does not imply MCP server execution, MCP prompt/resource injection, or MCP trust policy changes.
  • Plugin surfaces remain Tool / Hook / Service / Ingress; outbound side effects are Tool metadata and host API grants, not a separate surface.