yoi/.yoi/tickets/00001KVJDJD02/thread.md

作成

LocalTicketBackend によって作成されました。

---

State changed

Ticket を workspace-panel が queued にしました。

---

Decision

Routing decision: implementation_ready_parallel

Reason:

• Panel Queue により、この Ticket は Orchestrator routing 対象として明示許可された。
• User standing directive: blocker が無いものは並列実行する。現在の 00001KVJABS1A review と WebFetch PDF work とは別 domain の prompt/workflow resource修正であり、直接 conflict はないため並列化できる。
• Ticket body は Intake role prompt / workflow の弱点、Ticket 化前調査 gate、draft-before-create、user agreement gate、spike/requirements_sync handling、stale vocabulary removal、Intake boundaries を実装可能な粒度で定義している。
• 未解決 relation blocker はない。
• Orchestrator worktree は clean、matching branch/worktree はなし。
• Risk domain は prompt-context / workflow-source / role-behavior / ticket-authority だが、Ticket は Intake が coder/reviewer/helper Pod を起動しないこと、implementation routing/merge/closeをしないこと、user agreement without official Ticket create ruleを維持することを明示している。bounded context check 後も implementation 前に必要な追加 human decision は見つからなかった。

Evidence checked:

• Ticket 00001KVJDJD02 body / thread / relations / artifacts。
• TicketRelationQuery(00001KVJDJD02): no blockers。
• TicketOrchestrationPlanQuery(00001KVJDJD02): no previous plan records; accepted plan recorded now。
• Workspace state:
  • Orchestrator worktree clean at 36b9ed45。
  • queued: 00001KVJA7V2R, 00001KVJDJD02。
  • inprogress: 00001KVJABS1A review only。
  • no matching Intake workflow branch/worktree。

IntentPacket:

Intent:

• Strengthen Intake model-facing role/workflow guidance so ambiguous requests go through a minimum investigation gate before official Ticket creation。
• Make Intake separate user claims, confirmed facts, unverified hypotheses, and undecided points in drafts/Tickets。

Binding decisions / invariants:

• Intake remains non-scheduler and must not spawn coder/reviewer/read-only investigation helper Pods。
• Intake must not create implementation worktrees, route implementation/review, merge, or close。
• User agreement before official Ticket creation remains required。
• Do not save user claims, confirmed facts, unverified hypotheses, and undecided points as if they are all requirements。
• Preserve prompt/workflow resource boundaries between bundled resources and workspace override; explain intended differences if they remain。
• Remove or replace stale Action required / Attention required vocabulary in draft templates with current Ticket-operation language。

Requirements / acceptance criteria:

• Intake prompt/workflow explicitly states when to inspect existing Tickets / workflows / relevant files before TicketCreate。
• If investigation is needed, Intake can stop at draft / spike_needed / requirements_sync_needed rather than official Ticket creation。
• resources/prompts/role/intake.md, resources/workflows/ticket-intake-workflow.md, and .yoi/workflow/ticket-intake-workflow.md are reconciled or their differences are intentional/clear。
• Ticket作成前 user agreement rule is preserved。
• Validation includes prompt/workflow diff review and git diff --check; run TicketDoctor if Ticket consistency needs checking。

Next action:

• Record queued -> inprogress and commit Ticket records before creating implementation worktree and spawning Coder。

---

State changed

Ticket body/thread, relation metadata, Orchestrator worktree state, visible Pods, existing branch/worktree, and bounded Intake prompt/workflow context were checked. There is no unresolved blocking dependency, no conflicting inprogress implementation, and no missing planning decision. Accepting this queued Ticket for parallel implementation before worktree/Pod side effects.

---

Implementation report

Implementation orchestration start:

• Acceptance records were committed on Orchestrator branch: e752a720 ticket: accept webfetch pdf and intake gate。
• Created implementation worktree /home/hare/Projects/yoi/.worktree/00001KVJDJD02-intake-investigation-gate on branch impl/00001KVJDJD02-intake-investigation-gate at e752a720。
• Spawned Coder Pod yoi-coder-00001KVJDJD02 with write scope limited to the implementation worktree and read-only root scope only for runtime workspace identity。
• Coder task explicitly forbids root/original workspace implementation, Intake helper Pod spawning behavior changes, implementation routing/merge/close scope creep, merge, Ticket close, and cleanup。

Next action:

• Wait for Coder implementation report, then inspect branch diff/validation evidence and route to Reviewer。

---

Implementation report

Coder implementation report received from yoi-coder-00001KVJDJD02.

Implementation commit:

• 1143ae1c workflow: add intake investigation gate

Changed areas reported:

• resources/prompts/role/intake.md:
  • Added explicit minimum investigation gate before TicketCreate / material refinement。
  • Reinforced user agreement before official Ticket creation。
  • Added separation of user claims, confirmed facts, unverified hypotheses, and undecided points。
  • Preserved Intake non-scheduler boundaries: no coder/reviewer/helper Pods, no worktrees, no routing/merge/close。
• resources/workflows/ticket-intake-workflow.md:
  • Expanded bundled workflow from thin pointer into concrete reusable Intake procedure。
  • Added Ticket化前の最小調査ゲート。
  • Added spike_needed / requirements_sync_needed draft stop behavior。
  • Replaced stale Action required / Attention required draft wording with Next Ticket operation。
  • Added recommended Ticket body sections for claims/facts/hypotheses/open questions。
  • Documented bundled-vs-workspace workflow boundary。
• .yoi/workflow/ticket-intake-workflow.md:
  • Reconciled workspace override with bundled workflow while preserving dogfooding-specific details。
  • Added explicit local investigation gate conditions and outputs。
  • Updated draft template and Ticket body guidance。
  • Clarified that workspace override may add Objective/split/local policy details but must not weaken bundled invariants。

Coder validation reported:

• git diff --check: passed。
• Stale vocabulary grep for Action required / Attention required in touched prompt/workflow files: no matches。
• Investigation-gate grep confirmed new terms are present:
  • minimum investigation gate
  • Ticket 化前の最小調査ゲート
  • spike_needed
  • requirements_sync_needed
  • Confirmed facts / sources
  • Unverified hypotheses
  • Undecided points / open questions
• Workflow/prompt test search: no dedicated workflow prompt tests found; only unrelated Dashboard test reference。
• No code tests run because changes are prompt/workflow Markdown only。

Known risks / deferrals:

• No runtime schema/code changes were made。
• .yoi/workflow/ticket-intake-workflow.md intentionally remains a more detailed workspace override; bundled workflow is compact reusable baseline。
• TicketDoctor not run by Coder; no Ticket record structure was changed。

Orchestrator evidence checked before review dispatch:

• Implementation worktree is clean。
• HEAD is 1143ae1c。
• Diff from acceptance e752a720..HEAD is one implementation commit touching 3 files, 186 insertions / 19 deletions。
• git diff --check e752a720..HEAD produced no diagnostics。

Next action:

• Dispatch Reviewer for r1 review against Ticket requirements, with focus on model-facing Intake behavior, Ticket化前 investigation gate clarity, user-agreement preservation, stale vocabulary removal, bundled/workspace workflow boundary, and Intake non-scheduler boundaries。

---

Plan

Review dispatch:

• Spawned Reviewer Pod yoi-reviewer-00001KVJDJD02-r1 against implementation branch impl/00001KVJDJD02-intake-investigation-gate。
• Review target commit: 1143ae1c workflow: add intake investigation gate。
• Review baseline: e752a720。
• Reviewer task focuses on Intake non-scheduler boundaries, user agreement before official Ticket creation, Ticket化前 investigation gate clarity, draft / spike_needed / requirements_sync_needed stop behavior, claims/facts/hypotheses/open questions separation, bundled/workspace workflow consistency, stale vocabulary removal, and absence of unintended runtime/code changes。
• Reviewer is instructed not to edit source, commit, merge, close the Ticket, or use TicketReview directly; it will report verdict/evidence back to Orchestrator。

---