6.6 KiB
Created
Created by LocalTicketBackend create.
Decision
Intake classification: this existing Ticket is sufficiently specified for Orchestrator routing.
- readiness: implementation_ready
- needs_preflight: false
- risk_flags: [workflow-prompts]
Rationale: the requested change is constrained to workflow/prompt wording and intent packet examples; it preserves escalation conditions, validation, concrete exclusions as binding decisions, and the Ticket state machine. No authority boundary, persistence, public API, security, or storage migration decision is left for a coder to make silently.
Intake summary
Existing Ticket refined and classified as implementation_ready. Scope is removal of generic Non-goals/Non-goals constraints sections and broad non-goal prompts from workflow templates and intent packet examples, replacing boundary expression with Binding decisions / invariants plus Implementation latitude. Preserve escalation conditions, validation, concrete exclusions as binding decisions, and the Ticket state machine. needs_preflight=false; risk_flags=[workflow-prompts].
State changed
Intake complete: requirements, acceptance criteria, implementation boundaries, validation, and routing signals are sufficient for Orchestrator review/queueing.
State changed
Ticket queued for Orchestrator routing.
Decision
Routing decision: implementation_ready
Reason:
- Intake classified this Ticket as
implementation_ready,needs_preflight=false; the requested change is scoped to workflow/prompt wording and intent packet examples. - Requirements and acceptance criteria are observable: remove generic
Non-goals/Non-goals / constraintsworkflow sections and broadやらないことは何か。prompts, while preserving concrete boundaries asBinding decisions / invariants,Implementation latitude, escalation conditions, and validation. - The code/workflow search shows the active maintained workflow-template hits are concentrated in
.yoi/workflow/{ticket-intake-workflow.md,ticket-orchestrator-routing.md,ticket-preflight-workflow.md,multi-agent-workflow.md}. Historic Ticket artifacts contain old wording and should not be rewritten. - Remaining uncertainty is bounded text/test cleanup, not a design-boundary decision.
Evidence checked:
- Ticket body and thread, including intake decision and queued event.
- Workspace state: current main workspace has only this new Ticket record uncommitted; runtime workspace identity bundle is in a separate worktree/re-review and should remain isolated.
- Code/workflow search for
Non-goals,Non-goals / constraints,Non-goals / invariants, andやらないことは何か。. - Ticket doctor: 0 errors.
IntentPacket:
Intent:
- Remove generic
Non-goalsworkflow-template language and make workflow examples express boundaries through concrete invariants and implementation latitude instead.
Binding decisions / invariants:
- Do not rewrite historic closed/open Ticket threads or artifacts just because they contain old
Non-goalstext. - Preserve the ability to state a concrete exclusion when it is genuinely a binding decision, invariant, authority boundary, or escalation condition.
- Preserve escalation conditions, validation sections, reviewer guidance, and the Ticket workflow/state model.
- Maintained workflow templates should avoid broad optional exclusion buckets that invite generic unrelated lists.
Requirements / acceptance criteria:
- Remove
Non-goals/Non-goals / constraintssections from maintained workflow templates and IntentPacket examples. - Remove Intake prompts such as
やらないことは何か。that ask agents to enumerate generic non-goals. - Replace relevant boundary examples with
Binding decisions / invariantsandImplementation latitudelanguage. - Keep reviewer guidance focused on recorded intent, binding decisions/invariants, implementation latitude, acceptance criteria, and explicit escalation conditions.
- Update prompt/workflow tests or role prompt guidance if any maintained test expects old section names.
Implementation latitude:
- Coder may choose exact wording, section order, and whether a specific concrete exclusion is better expressed as an invariant or escalation condition.
- Coder may update adjacent maintained workflow-template wording where needed for consistency, but should avoid broad documentation churn.
Escalate if:
- A workflow genuinely requires a separate broad exclusion bucket after rewriting.
- Removing old wording would obscure a real authority boundary rather than clarify it.
- Required updates extend beyond maintained workflow/prompt templates into historic Ticket artifacts or unrelated docs.
Validation:
- Search maintained workflows/prompts for old generic section names and broad
やらないことprompt. - Run focused prompt/workflow tests if present.
target/debug/yoi ticket doctororcargo run -q -p yoi -- ticket doctor.cargo fmt --checkonly if Rust/test code changes.git diff --check.nix build .#yoiis required if runtime resources/prompts packaged into the product are changed; if only.yoi/workflowproject records change, explain why Nix build was omitted.
Current code map:
.yoi/workflow/ticket-intake-workflow.md.yoi/workflow/ticket-orchestrator-routing.md.yoi/workflow/ticket-preflight-workflow.md.yoi/workflow/multi-agent-workflow.md- Search broader maintained prompt/test paths for old labels before reporting.
Critical risks / reviewer focus:
- Do not simply rename
Non-goalsto another generic exclusion bucket. - Do not remove concrete authority boundaries or escalation conditions.
- Do not edit historical Ticket records as part of cleanup.
- Ensure workflow examples still give coder/reviewer enough boundary information.
State changed
Accepted queued implementation after reading the Ticket, workspace state, and maintained workflow-template hits. This acceptance precedes worktree creation and coder/reviewer Pod spawning.