6.7 KiB
Created
Created by tickets.sh create.
Decision
Updated based on user direction:
- keep this as the existing
tui-composer-history-persistenceticket rather than creating a duplicate; - default user-data shape should be like
~/.yoi/<path-to-pwd>/composer-history.jsonusing a path-safe/stable workspace key; - do not create composer history under workspace
./.yoi/; - bound persisted recall history to about 30 entries per workspace instead of the older 100-entry note;
- keep typed
Segmentstorage, non-destructive recall semantics, and no Pod/session transcript mutation.
Intake summary
既存 Ticket を確認し、同目的の open Ticket は他にないことを確認した。要件は、TUI composer の Up/Down recall 履歴を user data dir 配下に workspace-scoped で永続化し、workspace ./.yoi/、Pod protocol、transcript、Worker/session history、model context には影響させないこと。保存対象は typed Segment vector、non-blank、連続重複抑止、workspace ごと最大 30 件程度。破損ファイルは startup を致命的に壊さず fallback する。受け入れ基準と validation は Ticket 本文に十分記録済みで、Orchestrator が routing 可能なため ready とする。
State changed
Intake 確認により、既存 Ticket は実装 routing 可能な状態です。未解決の blocking open question はありません。主な reviewer focus は user-data persistence 境界、private/secret 混入前提の非露出、workspace 分離、既存 TUI recall semantics の回帰防止です。
State changed
Ticket を workspace-panel が queued にしました。
Decision
Routing decision: defer_parallel_tui_work
This Ticket is queued and implementation-ready, but I am intentionally not accepting it to inprogress yet.
Reason:
- There is already an active queued-route TUI implementation in progress:
tui-chat-markdown-table-rendering, with Coder Podcoder-tui-chat-markdown-table-renderingrunning in.worktree/tui-chat-markdown-table-rendering. tui-composer-history-persistencealso touches TUI composer/input behavior and likely adjacent tests/helpers.- Running both TUI changes concurrently would raise conflict/review risk without a clear need; this Ticket can follow immediately after the table-rendering Ticket reaches merge-ready or lands.
State decision:
- Leave this Ticket
queued. - Do not create a worktree or spawn a coder for it yet.
Next action:
- Re-read this Ticket after
tui-chat-markdown-table-renderingfinishes review/merge routing, then accept it from queued if still unblocked.
State changed
Accepted queued implementation after re-reading the Ticket and current workspace state. The previously active TUI table-rendering work has been reviewed, merged, closed, and cleaned up, so the earlier parallel-TUI-work deferral no longer applies.
Decision
Routing decision: implementation_ready
Reason:
- This Ticket has clear storage, privacy, workspace-separation, and recall-semantics requirements.
- The earlier deferral behind
tui-chat-markdown-table-renderingis resolved: that Ticket has been merged, closed, and cleaned up. - Main workspace is clean and there are no active implementation worktrees, so implementation side effects can proceed safely.
IntentPacket:
Intent:
- Persist TUI composer input recall history per workspace in user data, while preserving the existing TUI-local/non-destructive recall semantics.
Binding decisions / invariants:
- Store composer history under the existing user data dir, not under workspace
./.yoi/. - Workspace histories must be separated by a stable/path-safe workspace key and include metadata sufficient to identify the source workspace/display name.
- Store typed
Segmentvectors, not lossy flattened strings, so structured input recall remains possible. - Persist only non-blank entries, suppress consecutive duplicates, and bound stored history to about 30 entries per workspace.
- Recalled input must not affect conversation state until the user explicitly submits it.
- Do not mutate Pod protocol, worker history, transcript/session logs, model context, or stored message history for recall operations.
- Treat history content as potentially private/secret: avoid diagnostics/logs/snapshots/tickets/model context exposure of saved entries.
- Corrupt history files must not make TUI startup fatal; fall back to empty history with a bounded warning if needed.
- Preserve existing multiline cursor navigation, Up/Down browse, draft restore, and edit-on-recall behavior.
Implementation latitude:
- Coder may choose the exact on-disk user-data path/key encoding if it is stable, path-safe, data-dir aware, and workspace-scoped.
- Coder may add a small persistence module near existing TUI composer history code or shared user-data helpers if present.
- Coder should prefer focused unit tests with temporary data dirs/workspaces for persistence, separation, bounding, duplicate suppression, corrupt-file fallback, and no workspace-file creation.
- If interactive confirmation is still useful, include exact manual steps in the implementation report, but do not rely on manual-only validation if focused tests are practical.
Escalate if:
- The implementation requires changing Pod protocol/history/session serialization.
- The implementation would store history under workspace
.yoi/. - Existing composer history representation cannot preserve typed
Segmentvectors without a larger input model redesign. - Secret/private content would be emitted into logs/diagnostics/tests/tickets/model context.
Validation:
- Focused TUI composer history persistence tests for same-workspace recall after reload, workspace separation, max-size bound, consecutive duplicate suppression, corrupt-file fallback, and no workspace
.yoioutput. - Existing TUI composer history/navigation tests if present.
cargo fmt --check.git diff --check.cargo check --workspace.nix build .#yoibefore final completion because TUI behavior/packaging changes.