yoi/.yoi/tickets/00001KTTB479X/thread.md

11 KiB

作成

LocalTicketBackend によって作成されました。


Plan

Intake refinement

既存 Ticket 本文・thread・artifacts を確認した。artifacts はなく、thread は作成イベントのみ。

Readiness

  • readiness: implementation_ready
  • open_questions: なし
  • risk_flags: [worktree-layout, ticket-backend, panel-launcher, prompt-workflow-guidance, authority-boundary, merge-completion, cleanup]

Orchestrator / Reviewer focus

  • Orchestrator の pwd、Ticket backend root、original workspace root、implementation worktree root を混同しないこと。
  • implementation branch に orchestration branch の Ticket churn を混ぜないこと。
  • merge-ready dossier は停止点ではなく checkpoint とし、standing merge authority・reviewer approval・safe target workspace・未解決 human gate なしが揃う場合だけ merge / validation / close or done / cleanup まで進めること。
  • resources/prompts/*.yoi/workflow/*、Panel/role launcher の実装が相互に矛盾しないこと。
  • filesystem Ticket backend 前提の運用分離であり、Git 外 Ticket store 移行や push 自動化は非目標として維持すること。

Validation focus

  • targeted tests または workflow-level validation で cwd/backend/root 分離を確認すること。
  • target/debug/yoi ticket doctor を通すこと。
  • コード・runtime resource・prompt 変更が含まれるため、完了前に nix build .#yoi を通すこと。

Intake summary

既存 Ticket 00001KTTB479X は実装・レビュー可能な粒度まで要件化済み。目的は Orchestrator を専用 orchestration worktree で実行し、implementation worktree は original workspace root 配下の sibling .worktree/<ticket> に作る運用・実装・prompt/workflow guidance を整えること。blocking open question はなし。主な risk flags は worktree-layout, ticket-backend, panel-launcher, prompt-workflow-guidance, authority-boundary, merge-completion, cleanup。Orchestrator は cwd/backend/root 分離、orchestration Ticket churn の混入防止、merge-completion authority 条件、prompt/workflow 整合性を重点確認して routing できる。


State changed

Intake refinement により、本文・thread・artifacts を確認し、blocking open question がない implementation_ready Ticket と判断した。ユーザーが panel で queue した後、Orchestrator が routing できる状態にする。


State changed

Ticket を workspace-panel が queued にしました。


State changed

Queue acceptance: unrelated dirty code/profile diffs were identified as stale reverted reviewer-blocker changes from the prior Ticket and were restored before acceptance. The remaining dirty state is this Ticket's workspace-panel queue update. Relation query has no blockers, orchestration-plan query has no existing records, and the Ticket is implementation_ready with explicit requirements for orchestration worktree / original workspace root / merge-completion guidance. Implementation side effects may proceed after this recorded acceptance.


Plan

Routing decision: implementation_ready

Reason:

  • Ticket is queued; user/panel authorized routing and user has given standing authorization to continue through merge-completion when reviewer approval and safety conditions hold.
  • Relation query has no blockers and orchestration-plan query has no existing records.
  • Workspace dirty state was checked. Stale bad role-profile diffs from the previous Ticket were restored; remaining dirty state was this Ticket's queued update.
  • Ticket body and Intake refinement contain concrete requirements, acceptance criteria, non-goals, validation focus, and risk flags.

Evidence checked:

  • Ticket body/thread/artifacts.
  • TicketRelationQuery: no blockers.
  • TicketOrchestrationPlanQuery: no records before this routing pass.
  • Workspace/worktree/branch state: main worktree only before acceptance.
  • Visible Pods: no active implementation child Pods.

IntentPacket:

  • Intent: make Orchestrator execution and implementation worktree creation explicitly distinguish orchestration worktree cwd/ticket backend from the original workspace root and target merge workspace.
  • Binding decisions / invariants: filesystem Ticket backend remains; no Git-external Ticket store; main workspace draft Tickets must not be implicit Orchestrator queue; implementation worktrees are siblings under original workspace root .worktree/<ticket> and must not be nested under Orchestrator cwd; implementation branches must not include orchestration Ticket churn; prompt/workflow guidance must not reintroduce dossier stop when standing merge authority/safe target/reviewer approval/no human gate are present.
  • Requirements / acceptance criteria: record design/implementation policy; update Panel/launcher/workflow/prompt guidance as needed; testable handling of Orchestrator cwd, Ticket backend root, original workspace root, implementation worktree root, target workspace/branch, and cleanup policy; target/debug/yoi ticket doctor; code/runtime resource/prompt changes require nix build .#yoi before completion.
  • Implementation latitude: exact naming/reuse policy for orchestration worktrees and exact split between docs, prompts, workflow text, and launcher code can be chosen if the invariants and tests are met.
  • Escalate if implementation requires changing Ticket storage backend authority, introducing push automation, or weakening merge/reviewer/safe-workspace checks.
  • Validation: focused tests for launcher/worktree context and prompt/workflow text where practical, cargo fmt --check, git diff --check, target/debug/yoi ticket doctor, and nix build .#yoi.

Implementation report

Implementation report

Branch/worktree: orchestrator-worktree-layout / .worktree/orchestrator-worktree-layout Commit:

  • 834caba2 feat: track orchestration workspace roots

Summary:

  • Added docs/design/orchestrator-worktree-layout.md to record the four-root model: role_workspace_root, original_workspace_root, implementation_worktree_root, and merge_target_workspace_root.
  • Extended TicketRoleLaunchContext / TicketRoleLaunchPlan with original/target workspace roots and derived implementation worktree root.
  • Orchestrator launch prompts now emit a Workspace routing context section so the model-visible task can distinguish the role runtime/Ticket backend root from original implementation and merge target roots.
  • Updated Orchestrator worktree-routing and merge-completion prompt resources so implementation worktrees are created under the recorded original workspace root and merge/cleanup runs against the recorded target workspace, not accidental process cwd.
  • Updated worktree-workflow to use <original-workspace-root>/.worktree/<task-name> and git -C <original-workspace-root> ... instead of assuming the Orchestrator cwd is the repository root.
  • Adjusted client Ticket-role prompt tests to cover workspace routing context and standing merge-completion authority behavior.

Validation run in branch:

  • cargo fmt --check passed.
  • cargo test -p client ticket_role --lib passed (18 passed).
  • git diff --check passed.
  • /home/hare/Projects/yoi/target/debug/yoi ticket doctor passed.
  • nix build .#yoi passed.

Notes:

  • Panel/workspace orchestration can later populate original_workspace_root and target_workspace_root when launching an Orchestrator from a dedicated worktree. This branch adds the plan/prompt plumbing and workflow policy without changing Ticket storage backend authority or introducing Git-external project records.

Review: request changes

Branch-local review verdict: request_changes

Blocker:

  • .yoi/workflow/multi-agent-workflow.md still contradicts the new root model. It still instructs creating ./.worktree/<task-name> relative to Orchestrator cwd and frames read/write authority, orchestration authority, merge, validation, and lifecycle around main workspace instead of recorded original/target workspace roots. Because this workflow is advertised/resident and referenced by the updated Orchestrator prompt, it can reintroduce old behavior despite the updated worktree-workflow.

Non-blocking notes:

  • TicketRoleLaunchContext / TicketRoleLaunchPlan root plumbing is directionally correct and generated Orchestrator prompt output exposes role_workspace_root, original_workspace_root, implementation_worktree_root, and merge_target_workspace_root.
  • Production callers still construct TicketRoleLaunchContext::new(workspace_root, TicketRole::Orchestrator) without supplying distinct original/target roots. This can be a follow-up boundary, but the branch is not a complete dedicated-orchestration-worktree launch path yet.
  • Tests cover new prompt wording and standing merge-completion wording, but should more strongly assert plan field values and that SpawnConfig stays on role_workspace_root when original/target roots differ.

Validation run by reviewer:

  • cargo test -p client ticket_role --lib passed (18 passed).
  • git diff --check $(git merge-base HEAD develop)..HEAD passed.
  • /home/hare/Projects/yoi/target/debug/yoi ticket doctor passed.
  • nix build .#yoi --no-link passed.

No files were modified by reviewer.


Implementation report

Fix-loop implementation report

Reviewer blocker fixed in amended implementation commit e7c78f96:

  • Updated .yoi/workflow/multi-agent-workflow.md so it no longer assumes Orchestrator cwd is the original repository root.
  • Multi-agent workflow now explicitly says implementation worktrees are created under the recorded original workspace root .worktree, and merge-completion runs against the recorded merge target workspace.
  • Replaced remaining main workspace merge/validation/Ticket-completion wording with recorded merge target / recorded Ticket backend wording where relevant.
  • Kept .yoi path-exclusion policy intact while clarifying Orchestrator workspace / Ticket backend authority boundaries.
  • Strengthened client tests to assert TicketRoleLaunchPlan root fields and that SpawnConfig.workspace_root remains the role runtime workspace root even when original/target roots differ.

Validation after fix:

  • cargo fmt --check passed.
  • cargo test -p client ticket_role --lib passed (18 passed).
  • git diff --check passed.
  • /home/hare/Projects/yoi/target/debug/yoi ticket doctor passed.
  • nix build .#yoi passed.

Reviewer reviewer-orchestrator-worktree-layout has been asked to re-review the amended branch.